- Joined
- 3 Feb 2002
- Messages
- 10,574
themafia_69 said:its all over the news i just looked for the first link i could find about it
Evil Marge said:
themafia_69 said:its all over the news i just looked for the first link i could find about it
Evil Marge said:
Tell you what,I'll go and tell my neighbours 7 year old daughter who has leukaemia that she should not go for treatment as she is wasting our tax money shall I?Lee said:I agree that's why I wonder why governments and health agencies spend billions on something that is untreatable. Proloning cancer victims, h.i.v. and a.i.d.s. victims, we all die sometime, so quit wasting my tax money.
Kermit_The_Frog said:with the ways things are now aids is just another population control method and we will need it sorry to say but people need to die the way it is going we will be over populated within the next 50 years, to a point where it will be a world wide problem. Aids is another check/balance.
Brake it to her gently.Evil Marge said:Tell you what,I'll go and tell my neighbours 7 year old daughter who has leukaemia that she should not go for treatment as she is wasting our tax money shall I?
Evil Marge said:So you people will refuse any kind of treatment if you ever become seriously ill??
I doubt that .
themafia_69 said:why would you refuse treatment, i dont get that, i bet u have taken a pain killer before same thing, just on a higher level
Tabula Rasa said:Yet another idiotic thread filled with dumbass comments, hows that for not beating around the bush Lee?
Steevo said:I am in the same boat with Lee, I grow tired of my hard earned moneybeing washed away on people who wasted their life. I feel sorry thatthings went wrong for them, but at the same time it was their decisionafter all. Not mine. But now I have to pay for it, and when I grow tobe old the money I put in will no longer be there.
In your post you did not say anything to that effect,even a 65 year old can go on to life another 20 odd years so why should they not be treated the same?As far as you and others seem to be concerned if a person is ill with a life threatening disease let them die as they'll die sometime or other anyway.And why cancer is mentioned in the same breath as HIV I do not know.Lee said:I won't catch H.I.V. then develop A.I.D.S. via sexual transmission, only if via blood transfusion, or being stabed by some junkies needle. I would refuse medical treatment for cancer.
So your doubts in my case are incorrect.
And Marge Doors, children with cancer, no I am talking about 65 year old +. You know this as you already told me you can read my mind.
Evil Marge said:In your post you did not say anything to that effect,even a 65 year old can go on to life another 20 odd years so why should they not be treated the same?As far as you and others seem to be concerned if a person is ill with a life threatening disease let them die as they'll die sometime or other anyway.And why cancer is mentioned in the same breath as HIV I do not know.
Simple answer to the start of this thread is Do not be a moron and have unprotected sex.We all know the risks and it just isn't worth it.
In the UK medical treatments are free to everyone through the National health serviceegghead said:treatments cures are reserved exclusivly to the rich (those who can afford)