Sazar
Rest In Peace
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2002
- Messages
- 14,905
Originally posted by Maveric169
There is only 1 big problem with your post.
There are no Innocent Civilians in IRAQ. Period! Lets get that straight. Iraqies knew the US was comming and was told to get the hell out of the way.
You have 2 types of "civilians". 1) is the type that they are for their government and against the occupation (and fight). 2) are against their government and for the occupation (and get the hell out of the way).
Now Turkey, Syria, Saudi Arabia, hell even Iran, all set up tent cities for the innocent civilians so they would not get caught in the cross fire. Did ANY of them go to these, NO! Anyone who stayed in the "hot zone" has something to lose and is helping Saddam. Therefore the're no longer "innocent civilians".
But alot of you all are right on the whole Iraq deal, the US should have handeled it differntly. We should have gave the damn country 48 hours for all innocent civilians to get the hell out, and then leveled the whole damn country with bombs and been done with it.
The whole damn country is a vietnam senario. That 5 year old kid you just risked your ass to protect...... just picked up an AK and shot you in the back. Anyone who has been to Iraq will agree.
no offense but its THEIR bloody country init?
why exactly will these people leave?
america delcared war... not vice versa... you expect all teh civilians to evacuate so the invaders can just drop big bombs all over the place and preen their feathers? no war is fought like that cept those planned by morons with little clue about what they are doing...
america through its actions has an obligation to do right in Iraq... specially in light of its campain in Afghanistan...