F
Fingers
Guest
Please don't flame my post. I do see other posts on ntfs vs. fat32. Even on this same page. Like two posts underneath this.
Anyway. i know about stability, security, size of partition, all that jazz. I want to know. What about performance. How does it compare?
I am big into performance because of gaming. I only want the best. I have searched and searched and one person I saw said that reportly ntfs was 5% slower then FAT32. Only one place. I want to use ntfs so i don't need to worry about the 32 gig partition size limit in xp.
Is this true. Can't anyone verify this?
I would greatly appreciate some insite from an intelligent folk. I have a 80 wd just waiting for me. I don't want to switch if it decreases my performance of game.
Thanks for all replies and thanks for your time
Fingers
Anyway. i know about stability, security, size of partition, all that jazz. I want to know. What about performance. How does it compare?
I am big into performance because of gaming. I only want the best. I have searched and searched and one person I saw said that reportly ntfs was 5% slower then FAT32. Only one place. I want to use ntfs so i don't need to worry about the 32 gig partition size limit in xp.
Is this true. Can't anyone verify this?
I would greatly appreciate some insite from an intelligent folk. I have a 80 wd just waiting for me. I don't want to switch if it decreases my performance of game.
Thanks for all replies and thanks for your time
Fingers