- Joined
- 8 Apr 2003
- Messages
- 6,376
they might want to change the name now - the chrome is tarnished
Not that it matters, cause I think people were reading into the TOS too much, but it looks like Google has heard your concerns.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10031703-56.html?tag=mncol;posts
The software maker told CNET News it plans to store about 2 percent of all such data, along with the IP address of the computer that entered the information.
it's not a tin foil hat, they are claiming that anything you post on the web is theirs to use at their discretion or non discretion
they might want to change the name now - the chrome is tarnished
They're going to have a plugin--tarnish remover.
4 Other than the limited license set forth in Section 11, Google acknowledges and agrees that it obtains no right, title or interest from you (or your licensors) under these Terms in or to any Content that you submit, post, transmit or display on, or through, the Services
It is relatively fast, though Opera still has it beat.
If you mean speed wise and in JavaScript or pure JavaScript, then these links may be of relevance.
http://w-shadow.com/blog/2008/09/03/google-chrome-vs-opera-js-speed-test/
http://www.gadgets-reviews.com/chrome-vs-opera-ie-firefox.html
the next thing you know ISPs will start illegally spying for the government, storing our confidential emails for 6 months, disclosing our identities without due process, and then capping our bandwidth...