the question itself reveals glaring lack of knowledge and/or experience - since when did a language in and of itself have "power"?
As an example you could have a tractor and an F1 racing car with the same raw engine power.... one is great for fields and the other for grand prix circuits - and their "power" can be compared similarly as equivalent but suited for different tasks.
The answer as to what is most powerful - is simple - BOTH not either in isolation, and preferably assisted by a good interpretive testing harness and poweruflk "make" procedural language too...
I hope this helps. The road to understanding software for you, grasshopper, is a long one
Windows has always been coded in C, all C++ does is add an OO Framework to which its advantages are dubious at best. Where you need time critical code and youknow your target CPU inside and out you would use manually optimized ASM.
ASM in itself is easy to learn but hard to master. Its also hard to trackwaht you're doing without writing copious quantities of notes.
Mr MFG here though codes in machine code... Its almost like he tripped and NASM landed in his brain
Ep, glad to see you come back and tidy up...did want to ask a one day favor, I want to enhance my resume , was hoping you could make me administrator for a day, if so, take me right off since I won't be here to do anything, and don't know the slightest about the board, but it would be nice putting "served administrator osnn", if can do, THANKS