The fastest SATA hard drive ever!

kcnychief

█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Political User
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
16,948
Loved reading about this earlier. The cool thing is that it seems to really kick ass in Raid 0, which from what I recall the 150GB/74GB versions made less than a 1% performance increase.
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
Joined
Apr 12, 2002
Messages
14,905
I am so underwhelmed, I am almost bored.

:)
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
Joined
Apr 12, 2002
Messages
14,905
Poor matt, people always stealing his cookies.
 

Dark Atheist

OSNN Veteran Addict
Staff member
Political User
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Messages
6,376
well he needs proper protection on them - glass jar with a lid on it and a sign saying Matts cookies DO NOT EAT - just wont cut it :p
 

tdinc

█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Political User
Joined
Dec 6, 2003
Messages
3,507
never paid attention to matt's post,

cookies given to matt. :)
 

Steevo

Spammer representing.
Political User
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
2,566
Pinch off this crap and get a SAS drive like a real man.
 

ElementalDragon

The One and Only
Joined
Aug 8, 2002
Messages
3,159
*waits for countless quantites of sheep herding towards a $300 300GB drive*

seriously.... i'd rather have space than speed. don't remember hard drive performance making a drastic improvement in gaming or anything like that..... except for maybe in RAID. Even so...... if you pay $600 to have a 600GB RAID array, just so you can gain a few frames while gaming.... you're an idiot. why not just spend ~$450 and get a 2TB array.
 

X-Istence

*
Political User
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
6,498
The real feat is the fact that they were able to fit it into a 2.5" form factor rather than the standard 3.5", this means that fast storage for notebooks is not too far into the future, now if they could only find a way to shrink that huge heatsink on it :p

These days a Seagate running at 7200 RPM with 32 MB of cache and 750 GB of space is plenty fast for most things that people do. You will long hit the bottle neck of whatever application/computer you are using/have. And in the server world this is not exciting what so ever, SAS is just as fast, and has been there for a while now.
 

madmatt

Bow Down to the King
Political User
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Messages
13,312
Great guys, way to piss on my parade. Thanks!

And no, I didn't order one.
 

rotjong

OSNN Senior Addict
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
573
That WD drive does look very nice but for the price... no thanks. I'd also like if the cache was larger.

I'd rather go with 2 x Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 ST3750330AS 750GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive even though they aren't as fast.

129.99 USD a piece giving you a total of 1.5 TB for less money and they have a nice 32 MB cache.

http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822148298

Regardless, I was interested when I heard about that WD drive.
 

ElementalDragon

The One and Only
Joined
Aug 8, 2002
Messages
3,159
i'd honestly avoid the Barracuda 11 series. they seem to be having a bad reputation so far. Hell, i had one of them (think it was the 500GB version).... and it died in JUST over a month. i mean literally went from working one night, to nowhere remotely close to even being able to be connected to a working computer the next afternoon. Thankfully Newegg took the RMA anyway. Now i'm sitting happily with a Western Digital 640GB drive.
 

rotjong

OSNN Senior Addict
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
573
i'd honestly avoid the Barracuda 11 series. they seem to be having a bad reputation so far. Hell, i had one of them (think it was the 500GB version).... and it died in JUST over a month. i mean literally went from working one night, to nowhere remotely close to even being able to be connected to a working computer the next afternoon. Thankfully Newegg took the RMA anyway. Now i'm sitting happily with a Western Digital 640GB drive.
I have been a WD fan for years and I have always swore by them but with the larger and larger drives I'm annoyed that they haven't increased their cache size. I can't believe they would release this new drive at 10,000 RPM and not increase the cache yet they did.

Thanks for the information on the Seagate drives, though. From numerous friends I had been told they are fast and work well while also having a decent warranty. I'd love to go with WD drives but I really want a 32 MB cache. For my new system I still have some decisions to make and I haven't purchased hard drives yet so I can still change my mind on that one. :)
 

ElementalDragon

The One and Only
Joined
Aug 8, 2002
Messages
3,159

X-Istence

*
Political User
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
6,498
There is much of a gain with 32 MB over 16 MB. Especially with newer file systems that take advantage of the bigger cache (ZFS for example). It means more data can quickly be written "to" disk and then read back, which is awesome for metadata on what blocks have not yet been written, since it changes so often most of the time the data is just stuck in cache.

There are other speed improvements with OS's and file systems that properly take advantage of the extra cache.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Hey ep!

All good with me, applying for microsoft mvp right now, should have done this a while ago.

Notifications don't work, I only found your response by comming back to hunt up some threads, if you want, give me your email address so we can keep in touch easier, mine is perriscalderon at gmail
Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Ep, glad to see you come back and tidy up...did want to ask a one day favor, I want to enhance my resume , was hoping you could make me administrator for a day, if so, take me right off since I won't be here to do anything, and don't know the slightest about the board, but it would be nice putting "served administrator osnn", if can do, THANKS

Been running around Quora lately, luv it there https://tinyurl.com/ycpxl
Electronic Punk wrote on Perris Calderon's profile.
All good still mate?
Hello, is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me ...

Forum statistics

Threads
61,976
Messages
673,275
Members
89,050
Latest member
lennerttt