Raid Setup (new harddrive)

N

Not Bman

Guest
Alright, I am sure it's been asked. I am sure I can find tons of info on Google, but I'd rather ask here.

I have 1 500GB SATA drive as my main drive.

I have 1 500GB SATA drive as my storage/backup drive.


Now I should be getting a new hard drive (500GB or 750GB)


Can I, and how can I add that new harddrive to that backup drive, without losing everything or moving it? And what would be the best type of raid to use as a storage/backup drive? If I wanted to add even more drives later as well.

Any tips and suggestions would be awesome.
 

Dark Atheist

OSNN Veteran Addict
Political Access
Joined
8 Apr 2003
Messages
6,376
in order to use raid the drives have to be the same size, and if possible same model, as to adding it to raid depends on what type of raid, if raid0 - i don't think you can keep all the info - if raid one i think you can
 
N

Not Bman

Guest
Well that is what I am asking, I guess in detail.

I want to keep the data as is, the drive is 500GB.

So I need to same harddrive (model as well) how do I add to it, I know I have to turn raid on in the bios, but every time I have done that in the past everything gets erased on the drive. And with Raid1 if that is my option, does that make it larger in size, or is it just mirroring it, or what?
 

fitz

Woah.. I'm still here?
Political Access
Joined
26 Apr 2004
Messages
4,084
*sigh* I tried to stay from this conversation.. I really did..

The drives really don't have to be the same size. Most array controllers can handle a drive if it's a bigger capacity, the extra space will just go wasted and can't be used.

RAID1 is just a mirror to provide redundancy - it won't add capacity.. it is also (normally) limited to 2 drives in the array.

RAID0 can stripe the drives to add capacity and a slight performance boost but provides no data redundancy.. it also has the problem that if 1 drive fails in a RAID0 array, you lose the data on both drives, or if you have a 3 drive RAID0 array and one drive fails, you lose the data on all 3 drives. Basically, the more disks you add to a RAID0 array, the percentage chance of total data loss increases.

RAID5, if your controller supports it, can do more than 2 drives in an array (in fact, you need a minimum of 3 drives to set up initially) and proves n-1 expansion where n is the number of drives in the array.. example: you have 3 drives that are 500GB each.. your total space in the array is the same as if you had 3-1 (n-1 or 2) drives.. or 1TB for 3x500GB drives in a RAID5 array. RAID 5 provides for expansion and redundancy for single drive failure and is fast for reading data but a bit slower on writing data.

RAID10 or RAID01 requires a minimum of 4 drives and are slightly different in how they setup the array. They both do a combination of mirroring and striping of data but RAID10 is FAR superior in many ways than RAID01. I've written a long post about the differences before if you want to search the forums for it (too lazy to find it right now and don't want to type it all out again).

edit: as far as keeping existing data on the drive, a RAID0/Stripe set will require both drives to be clean - meaning data will be lost. A RAID1/mirror should be non-destructive on creation.. it shouldn't have to delete the data, but I've seen some silly implementations of RAID with onboard controllers in particular that for some reason, wipe both drives no matter which RAID type you select. Really though I understand why they do that. SATA drives tend to have a higher incidence of drive errors and failures and it's nice to start a RAID array with a clean slate.

You have a couple options depending on how your board is setup. If you have multiple SATA controllers, you can move your drive with the data to the independent/non-RAID controller ports and buy two new drives and connect them to the RAID controller ports and set them up in the array of your choosing (generally, I always recommend against RAID0 but people always seem to do it anyway).

You can find out if the RAID1 creation will be a destructive process or not and try to setup a RAID1 array if it isn't destructive - but one of your goals was later expansion by adding more drives so a RAID1 probably won't work for you.

If you take my advice and stay away from RAID0, you're left with either RAID5 or RAID10/01 and you would need to find out if your RAID controller supports these but they do require a minimum of 3 (for RAID5) or 4 (for RAID10/01) drives to start.
 
Last edited:
N

Not Bman

Guest
Wow, that's a great deal of useful information.

How would I find out if my controller supports it. I have a EVGA 780i SLI motherboard if that helps.
 

Dark Atheist

OSNN Veteran Addict
Political Access
Joined
8 Apr 2003
Messages
6,376
Storage I/O
1 x UltraDMA133
6 x Serial ATA 300MB/sec with support for RAID 0, RAID1, RAID 0+1, RAID5, JBOD
1 x Floppy disk drive connector
 
N

Not Bman

Guest
So the best one RAID10 I don't support, but RAID01 is just as good?
 

fitz

Woah.. I'm still here?
Political Access
Joined
26 Apr 2004
Messages
4,084
How would I find out if my controller supports it. I have a EVGA 780i SLI motherboard if that helps.

If you know the model of your board, why don't you try looking up the specs on it to find out what your board will support?

So the best one RAID10 I don't support, but RAID01 is just as good?

I've written a long post about the differences before if you want to search the forums for it (too lazy to find it right now and don't want to type it all out again).
It's called searching for my post I mentioned to learn the differences..

the post fitz refers to is here http://forum.osnn.net/showpost.php?p=808872 - have a read and decide, if not ask back here :)

Thanks Carpo.. reps for not being lazy like me! :)
Storage I/O
1 x UltraDMA133
6 x Serial ATA 300MB/sec with support for RAID 0, RAID1, RAID 0+1, RAID5, JBOD
1 x Floppy disk drive connector
again.. thanks :)
can also look at this post in the same thread..
 
Last edited:
N

Not Bman

Guest
So RAID 0+1 is what I want, correct me if I am wrong.

Now how would I go about doing that. I need 4 drives for that right? So if I were to do that with 4 500GB drives, how man space would I actually have?
 

fitz

Woah.. I'm still here?
Political Access
Joined
26 Apr 2004
Messages
4,084
So RAID 0+1 is what I want, correct me if I am wrong.
only you can determine what you want.. I just provide information :)

Now how would I go about doing that. I need 4 drives for that right? So if I were to do that with 4 500GB drives, how man space would I actually have?

Need at least 4 drives.. when/if you want to expand the array, you'll need to do it in multiples of 2 drives.

4x500GB drives would provide 1TB of raw space.

edit: oh, and you won't be able to preserve data on an existing drive if you want to use it in the array.
 
N

Not Bman

Guest
I would love to get a drobo, wanted one for awhile, but yes they are to expensive.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Rest in peace my friend, been trying to find you and finally did in the worst way imaginable.
Terrahertz wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Yo fellas!
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Where are you buddy?
Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Hey EP! All good with me, applying for Microsoft MVP right now, should have done this a while ago.

Notifications don't work, I only found your response by coming back to hunt up some threads, if you want, give me your email address so we can keep in touch easier!
Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
EP, glad to see you come back and tidy up...did want to ask a one day favor, I want to enhance my resume , was hoping you could make me administrator for a day, if so, take me right off since I won't be here to do anything, and don't know the slightest about the board, but it would be nice putting "served administrator osnn", if can do, THANKS

Been running around Quora lately, luv it there!

Forum statistics

Threads
61,997
Messages
673,411
Members
5,591
Latest member
nodee