These new 970 chips should set that right though and put Apple back on top [/B]
Originally posted by SPeedY_B
Oh it can, how do you think my monitor got here?
Originally posted by GoNz0
for about 3 months, then spend 2 years in the shadows again
Absolutely Hilarious!
I love it when Mac users get offended if people diss their “culture” or whatever.
The fact is that this guy has shown some of the flaws in Apples benchmarks, he’s not saying the G5 will run like a 66MHz 486, he’s simply saying that the G5 is not as good as apple claim it to be.
Some of the peoples reactions are plain ridiculous, it’s pathetic, if someone called my AMD slow, I’d just agree with them, it is slow, whats the point in arguing.. the machine does what I want it to, even though its not a 3.2GHz Pentium 4.
Yep. Number tweaking. Yummy.Originally posted by SPeedY_B
ooh dear.. read here - http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/
Originally posted by Zedric
Yep. Number tweaking. Yummy.
Originally posted by SPeedY_B
No-ones said anything against the mac.. what's your problem?
Originally posted by GoNz0
ROFL, fact still remains the mac is for posers, it looks cool and cant do much at all.
Originally posted by SPeedY_B
Ah, sorry then.
My honest and blunt opinion : Macs are for people who want to use them, Windows is for people who want to use that, Linux is for people who want to use Linux, BSD is... you get the idea
When it comes down to it things like this could be argued for hours on end, it's a matter of preference.
Originally posted by SPeedY_B
it's a matter of preference.
The means are different.Originally posted by Sazar
the numbers were completely legit
they tweaked compiler
basically it handicapped the p4 setup's allowing apple to SEEM faster...