2257MB and still counting...

[mlakrid]

I use POP3 as well, but my outlook archives are darn near 4GB! W00t!

LOL I thought your archives are not supposed to surpass 1.5GB???

OMG

 

[American Zombie]

Well then you know what to do: gimme, gimme....

Reps + when ya do!!

Check your PM's :up:

 

[mlakrid]

Check your PM's :up:

Done and your rep+ added... my thanks!

 

[kcnychief]

LOL I thought your archives are not supposed to surpass 1.5GB???

OMG

If you have outlook 2003, you can have archives that are "reliable" up to 20GB. Big difference from 2002 (XP)

Note: It has to be created from new in 2003, can't import from older and expect file improvements.

 

[mlakrid]

If you have outlook 2003, you can have archives that are "reliable" up to 20GB. Big difference from 2002 (XP)

Note: It has to be created from new in 2003, can't import from older and expect file improvements.

WAY TO GO MICROSOFT...

what a bunch o dorks... they should have made it backwards compaitble... even with the possibility of file corruption it could have been worth it... no biggie try try again type thing... instead you got to make a new one? Oh brother does that sound like $$ grubbing people...

 

[Howling Wolf]

As yours I guess, my Gmail Inbox has reached 2400Mo today... when do they stop this ? Do they manufacture their own hdd's and where do they store them ? I can't imagine how many of them they have running already...

 

[Khayman]

I use pop3 as well, but i leave them on gmail so i can access them anywhere

 

[Howling Wolf]

I use pop3 as well, but i leave them on gmail so i can access them anywhere

I agree with that but it doesn't answer to my questionnings...

 

[Xie]

As yours I guess, my Gmail Inbox has reached 2400Mo today... when do they stop this ? Do they manufacture their own hdd's and where do they store them ? I can't imagine how many of them they have running already...

I'm not sure when they'll stop but I'm sure their is plenty of room in the GIANT datacenters they must have. They are basically their own ISP. When you get to be that size HD's are a dime a dozen.

 

[SPeedY_B]

Google have more data storage than god. Simple as that.

 

[Howling Wolf]

lol
I guess you're right... but there's a limit to everything, isn't it ? How much storage can they afford for free ? The ads on Gmail are pointless, at least for me, I never clic on any of them...

 

[Admiral Michael]

Id settle for just 1-2GB of Ad-less interface.

 

[Khayman]

They also know that the vast majority of users will never use anywhere
near that amount so they don't actualy have to have Xgb x Xusers of
space at any one time<br>

 

[Xie]

They also know that the vast majority of users will never use anywhere
near that amount so they don't actualy have to have Xgb x Xusers of
space at any one time

Yeah it's more marketing and showing up the compitition (who were starting to over 1GB as well). They know the vast majority will never reach anywhere near the limit.

 

[mooo]

makes me want to make a 1gig dummy file and email it to myself and forward around gmail just to teach them a lesson anyone want it?

 

[Admiral Michael]

Or try this:

http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm

 

[Xie]

makes me want to make a 1gig dummy file and email it to myself and forward around gmail just to teach them a lesson anyone want it?

Well you would have to break it up into 10MB files as I believe thats the cap (but that might be just pics w/ a lower cap on "data" files). Also why "punish" a company thats nice enough to give you a nice FREE email account w/ more space then you can use w/ a very nice interface?

 

[mooo]

I wouldn't actually do it gmail is the best free service for mail i have used. The tabs on the replied chats has to be one of the greatest functions i have used.

 

[Admiral Michael]

The tabs on the replied chats has to be one of the greatest functions i have used.

Question: can outlook 2003 do this?