Not Guilty

I was suprised that he atleast wasnt found guilty of serving alcohol to minors, I thought that was a confirmed action. But I guess not....
 
I don't believe people are defending this toss pot for what he has done.

No matter what way you look at it, mj has admitted to sleeping in the same bed as a minor. This jury has just said that it's okay for an adult to sleep in the same bed as a minor, even though they are not related in anyway! Yes the parents have to be held to question as to why they let their son sleep with him in the first place, BUT DOES THIS MAKE IT RIGHT? OF COURSE NOT! If it was joe public they would have locked them up and thrown away the key. Another example of how celebrities in America can get away with just about anything.

BTW If it were a girl instead of a boy, this would have been an open and shut case, he would have been found guilty without a shadow of a doubt.
 
found not guilty or not, he's guilty. Just because he was acquitted, doesn't mean he didn't do it. Money and fame bought the verdict as does with most celebs. You don't put approach alarms by your bedroom door unless you've got something to hide. And all that porn they found.............sheesh. Peter Pan, my ass.
 
Eh, I dont know. I was kinda dissapointed he wanst foudn guilty because I thought he was, but non of us were on that jury and I really doubt it was fixed at all. Also, the charges wernt about the morals of it, it was if he did something Illegal.
 
ThePatriot said:
There is DEFINITELY something wrong with MJ's grey matter, but you didn't have to look too hard to see the accusers were gold diggers.

I really couldn't agree with this statement more.

Melon
 
The story isn't over yet. Now they can do what happened with OJ. Sue him in civil court where they will probably win. Poor Michael, he is so abused and mis-understood.
 
No much to go on in civil court seems that who ever had something bad to say was someone who was fired from his job , as for the above statements saying he is guilty and it was money , I think your 100% wrong on all counts he did not give them wine they were seen stealing the wine. No matter I am happy MJ got the right votes, poor guy he is too soft for this world.
 
I hope the procecute the mother for this .. If I was MJ I would take her to civil court.
 
Typically, "birds of a feather" will support each other - you want to go that route?

The type of porn is in question. Peter Pan and porn? LOL, how innocent. I don't know the acuracy of this site but still. I don't care what you think. He's guilty. As far as your comments go, case closed.

Jackson is a textbook pedophile, a 46-year-old predator who plied children with wine, vodka, tequila, Jim Beam whiskey, and Bacardi rum. A man who gave boys nicknames like Doo Doo Head and Blowhole and then quizzed them about whether they masturbated and if "white stuff" came out. A man who conducted drinking games with minors and surfed porn with them on a laptop in his Neverland Ranch bedroom, noting that if anyone asked what they were looking at, the kids should just say they were watching "The Simpsons." A man who frequently talked sex with his little companions and explained that "boys have to masturbate or they go crazy." A man who told one pajama-clad boy that he wanted to show him how to "jack off." When the tipsy child declined the demonstration, Jackson announced, "I'll do it for you," and buried his hand in the boy's Hanes briefs, size small. And a man who emphasized to his little friends that these activities were "their little secret" and should not be disclosed to anyone, even if a gun was at their head.
 
Last edited:
I followed the case here and there and it was clear that he was not guilty and the people that said anything against him were EX << fired employees and or the mother of the kid or the kid himself who Jay Leno said seemed rather scripted a little too serious << the trash you can find is just that trash, they were $ hunters , welfare scammers and star chasers thats all .
 
lynchknot said:
Typically, "birds of a feather" will support each other - you want to go that route?

The type of porn is in question. Peter Pan and porn? LOL, how innocent. I don't know the acuracy of this site but still. I don't care what you think. He's guilty. As far as your comments go, case closed.
you don't know if that link is true but you believe it anyway?...interesting indeed.

the prosecution got the venue that they wanted and the jury that they wanted.

the jury discarded "evidence" like what you posted.

this parent was a grifter and tried to take advantage of her sons' cancer, when the money pot ran dry, she tried to get more.

lynchnot, make all the points you like but please leave out things like "birds of a feather...etc"...why do you want to insult the people you are having a conversation with?

make your points, leave personal attacks for another forum

I agree, mj is one strange cooky, and I wouldn't trust my child alone with him, but this particular case was a set up
 
I'm done here. I am no longer a member. I have been thinking of reducing the amount of tabs in my browser anyway. Good bye.
 
Thread cleaned Keep it civil you bickering children and stop trolling otherwise the ban stick is going to get excited
 
Aprox said:
Also, the charges wernt about the morals of it, it was if he did something Illegal.

I think that hits the nail on the head, it doesnt really matter if you think it was right or wrong, it was did he do anything illegal or not.

There didnt seem to be much proof to the accusations, the one 'porn' mag was proved to have been published about 2 months after the alleged incident etc, in my opinion Not guilt was the right verdict (although I think sleeping in the same bed a the children is very wrong, but as said above its not about morals)
 
Wonder how much slack these kids are gonna get due to their parent's idiocy (provided this was all made up and not that the prosecution didnt convince the jury).
They're probably the real victimes in this.
 
Yeah I thought he was guilty , but im happy he was not convicted. Coz if he was sum con artist mom would walk away with millions! Im happy coz everyone lost! MJ maybe cleared but hez almost broke! hehe yes Im a Sadist! lol

oh i heard hes gonna try to get back some $$$ by releasing some unreleased songs! there are also rumors of the Jackson-5 of going back on tour! Yeah like Jermaine's gonna sing again! lol

Oh boy you guys are scaring me with ur Rep counts! u all got over 1000! im stuck at a measily 300! I guess no one likes me *sigh* :(
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Also Hi EP and people. I found this place again while looking through a oooollllllldddd backup. I have filled over 10TB and was looking at my collection of antiques. Any bids on the 500Mhz Win 95 fix?
Any of the SP crew still out there?
Xie wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Impressed you have kept this alive this long EP! So many sites have come and gone. :(

Just did some crude math and I apparently joined almost 18yrs ago, how is that possible???
hello peeps... is been some time since i last came here.
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Rest in peace my friend, been trying to find you and finally did in the worst way imaginable.

Forum statistics

Threads
62,015
Messages
673,494
Members
5,623
Latest member
AndersonLo
Back