TheBlueRaja
BR to Some
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2002
- Messages
- 766
So if Eidos made this as an internal build patch - why was it made available to the public on their website?
Originally posted by StormFront
Jesus.......
Originally posted by StormFront
Terrahertz
No. I wont give it a rest.
Reason? Sorry dude, but you are working with too few facts.
You don't like what I say? Fine report me or ignore me but don't tell me to stop talking 'cos you don't like the words!
NVidia will have their day in court after all the little news-ites have blown their load.
I understand where all you guys are coming from but for the love of god! Why take it so far?
These benchmarks are obviously crap! NVIdia have NEVER denied that the current drivers are incapable of running HL2. Thats the way it has always been with Nvidia. You need a driver to do a job and in this case that driver is still coming.
So, park your horse, grab a drink and just shut the hell up until we have a real comparison.
As soon as the REAL drivers are released I will use them and run some benchmarks for you.
If i am wrong and NVidia are the crock YOU seem to think they are I will freely admit it.
'Till then. 'Till we have SOME FACTS can we all stop blabbering and reading the death rights of NVidia? Or would that involve reason and logic??????
Jesus.......
Originally posted by Teddy
Hardly proof...looks like the same pic with the gamma or something reduced.
Where was this pic from? A reliable source or someone with a little too much time on their hands and a copy of PaintShop Pro?
Originally posted by StormFront
Actually check that. Just realised that this has to be a fake. The 2 frames are identical in their object and explosion positioning. No way you can render an image like this (specifically the 'splodes) twice and get everything exactly the same....
Originally posted by StormFront
I gotta disagree here. The Nvidia render looks better. The lighting is smoother and more subtle and you can see a greater level of detail with less edges and blurring occuring...
Just my 2 cents anyhoo
Originally posted by Sazar
they both render the same image... but the ati shot actually uses better shadowing... which is WHY it looks blurrier... realise that the nvidia shot is not showing proper shadowing.. reducing its workload and therefore inflating its benchmark figures...
Originally posted by StormFront
Few answers first:
Handybuddy: Sorry, I aint christian. Far from it.
The reason you have a problem with your drivers is that when you quote their title you omit one vital word:
BETA.
They are still in development. Comprende?
Blueraja: Believe what you want. This convesation is childish
As to getting rowdy: I agree. Sorry, but I have seen my arse with this and not just 'cos I am one of the peeps who bought an FX.
All the reviews, benchmarks and tests so far are void. As I said in my last post Nvidia have never claimed that their current drivers will work with HL2
For reference I have 3 games that are fully DX9 dependant and they all work VERY well. There is no hint of any problems. But obviously you guys basing your opinions on a game that NONE OF US HAVE PLAYED YET! is valid. I apologise. Your psychic helmets clearly work better than mine
Originally posted by TheBlueRaja
Owned....