http://img278.echo.cx/my.php?image=untitled0bg.jpggonaads said:Down load this and find out...
This one is newer than the one that Admiral Michael posted. Gives more info.
AMD CPU ID (see attachment)
[edit]actually it is a different one.
dude i already understand that its an athlon xp but gonaads told me to download an updated app from amd to check it out, i did it and i post what the app says.LeeJend said:Which part of "IT IS NOT AN AMD 64 Processor" are you not understanding?
well....actualy i got it free, the guaranty replace my old one with this, i was just asking if it supports 64 bits programs.chastity said:I think now its more what do have if I don't have what I thought I bought.
unknown_user said:well....actualy i got it free, the guaranty replace my old one with this, i was just asking if it supports 64 bits programs.
intel celeron 667mhzAdmiral Michael said:Curious...
what specs was your old one?
well....i dont really like SP2j79zlr said:Just a side note, you need to update your PC, you need to install SP2.
j79zlr said:Just a side note, you need to update your PC, you need to install SP2.
so your saying that everyone that dosent want to upgrade to SP2 its dumb? dude theres people that still use windows 98 and 2000 so are they dumb too cause they dont whant to pay $100 for a new OS when they are happy with there current one?.j79zlr said:Uh, OK, I have installed SP2 on maybe 75 PC's now without any issues. If you are getting a 169 address that means the network card cannot find the DHCP server and it gets assigned a generic address.
I don't really care I guess, if people were smart enough to update, I wouldn't make so much money fixing all of the crap they get on their PC's.
just wondering if its true what your saying then why Internet Explorer 7 will only be for XP?. does they want to damage earlier OS like 98,me and 2000 just to force users to upgrade to XP?j79zlr said:Yes, that is exactly what I am saying, if you run 98 or 2k, you still have to stay current on updates. M$ does not push out updates usually unless there is a known exploit that they are patching, so if there is an update, update. Look at the damage done by the blaster worm, the patch was out weeks before it was wide spread, it was the ignorance of the end user that enabled it to spread. Then months later the exact same thing happened with the sasser worm.
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/05/27/422721.aspxj79zlr said:Well in short yes, you really shouldn't be using IE at all anyways because of the security risk on any system, upgraded or not, but yes that is the plan from MS, the support cycle is going to run out on 98 and 2000 shortly. I don't agree with it, but it is what it is. Recently a vulnerability was found in IE6 SP1, but the patch was only released for Win2k, the 98 patch was not made, because MS deemed it non-critical, but deemed it highly critical on all other OS. They are priceless.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-020.mspx
Notice there is no patch for 98, also note that Secunia deems this update as highly critical, as does MS. http://secunia.com/advisories/14922/