Athlon 1900+ XP??

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by AaronMcarthur, Jul 27, 2002.

  1. I've seen in many ppl's info, they say they have athlon 1700's and 1800's and now 1900's......exactly what r these numbers representing or is it a model#?
     
  2. chastity

    chastity Moderator Political User

    Messages:
    2,273
    Location:
    Arizona near the Grand Canyon
    Those numbers are AMD's perforce rating or in simple terms it means that a 1700+ does the same amount of process as a 1.7 ghz chip but at a slower clock speed
     
  3. Goatman

    Goatman Ska Daddy

    Messages:
    676
    it's just a model number, I know the 1800+ is 1.53. I think it's a way of comparing their CPUs to the intels
     
  4. FoSsiL

    FoSsiL Guest

    the model number means that its able to run as fast as the pentium 4 chips. like the Athlon XP 1900+ is 1.6GHz and its able to keep up with the pentium 4 1.9ghz chip or faster
     
  5. How do u know how many ghz these model numbers equal up to be.........and instead of me buying a inten pentium 4 processor chip.....wud i be looking for amd 1700 and 1800 and so on.....?
     
  6. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    It really all depends on yer preference. Intel or AMD, the 1700+ or 2100+ is the way AMD is challenging Intel on actual CPU processing. AMD is saying that the clock speed is not relevant to the performance of the CPU in relation to actual processing.

    AMD is stating that, example: A 2100+ Athlon is as fast as a 2.1 Ghz Pentium 3 or 4...ummmm... whatever. But it is only at an actual clock speed of... say1.8 or 1.9 Ghz.
     
  7. gonaads

    gonaads Beware the G-Man Political User Folding Team

    Thank You... Got the speeds wrong :rolleyes: :p
     
  8. dijital

    dijital Guest

    i dont remember the actual speeds, but i know the 1600+ is 1.4Ghz cuz that what i use :D

    try the amd website, they should have the numbering system listed there
     
  9. canadian_divx

    canadian_divx Canadian_divx

    if you really want to truely know what the 1900 and 1700 and so on, numbers mean go to amd's web site and look at the whitepaper and they tell you all about it in there and it explaiens everything about the chips. but in short the number stands for a performance rating
     
  10. Krux

    Krux Nissan Powered

    Messages:
    1,649
    well when u actually have one in your computer u can check the speed either at your post screen when u start it up or right click my computer and hit properties and it will give u the the brand and number and speed
     
  11. I got it now, thank you everyone.

    Athlon XP 1800+ can outperform a 1.8ghz
    Athlon XP 1600+ can outperform a 1.6ghz

    I understand it now.
     
  12. WHat should i chose if i were building a computer, AMD Athlon XP or Intel Pentium 4.

    How long is it ognna be before a P5 comes out?
     
  13. [CpK]Bastid

    [CpK]Bastid Guest


    wooohooooo:)
     
  14. Gary Pandher

    Gary Pandher Moderator

    Messages:
    884
    i'd say go with amd
    their chips cost less
    perform the same or better
    i would have if i knew about that :(
     
  15. chastity

    chastity Moderator Political User

    Messages:
    2,273
    Location:
    Arizona near the Grand Canyon
    Well which chip u get is ur choice. But if u r looking for advice I agree that an AMD is cheaper price wise the a Pentium 4. However that said from what I've read the newest Pentium 4's actually outperfrom AMD Althon XP due to the fact that Intel increased the front side bus speed and added a larger level 2 cache to the chip. If ur on a tight budget go AMD if u what that fastest chip go Intel. For all practical purpose's u will not notice any different in performace between an AMD and an Intel chip unless u benchmark them.
     
  16. FoSsiL

    FoSsiL Guest

    I don't really like pentium 4 because of the price, its just crazy what they are charging you. The athlon give over all good performance but the one problem i dont like is the heating.
    i have athlon 1ghz and evertime i play video games, i have to open my computer panel for ventilation to prevent from freezing
    also i dont like wasting a whole lotta money on a heatsinker
    every product have a negative side.
     
  17. Goldy

    Goldy Guest

    Yes Intel's chips are dearer.
    But you get wot you pay for!
    The P4 has much better performance when multitasking and there is no need to "take the side off your case!" when playing games.
    Overheating is quite a prob with AMD chips. I know of 3 chips that have burnt out, all AMD. Admittedly the heatsink might not have been seated correctly, but the people who where fitting them are far from what I would call stupid and had read all the docs on fitting the heatsink and fan. Yet the chips still burnt out within 2yrs of purchase. This is what I find scary about AMD chips! A P4 on the other hand would have throttled back or shutdown if the heat had got too high!
    In my experiance I have only ever heard of 3 chips buning out they were all AMD and none of these had been overclocked.
     
  18. 2z

    2z OSNN Gamer

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    England
    he said that

    A P4 on the other hand would have throttled back

    is that not the same ???
     
  19. Goldy

    Goldy Guest

    Right so the Heatsink/fan that comes with the chip is insufficient and the end user is supposed to know this when they purchase a m/b, memory, chip heatsink and fan from a retailer of AMD chips.
    The fact of the matter is that if you buy a AMD chip and the fan fails or the heatsink is not fitted correctly its gonna cost for a new chip. I on the other hand don't have that worry.
     
  20. 2z

    2z OSNN Gamer

    Messages:
    2,439
    Location:
    England
    :confused: would that be yours ? Goldy? or the thread starter
    AaronMcarthur
    ;)