What is up with Intel?

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Hipster Doofus, Aug 13, 2004.

  1. Hipster Doofus

    Hipster Doofus Good grief Charlie Brown

    Messages:
    5,920
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    Have the people over at Intel run out of imagination for their processor names? Or are they throwing in the towel to AMD?

    I just saw that they have a Pentium 4 Prescott 2.8G 533.

    Guess what? They also have a Pentium 4 Prescott (Celeron) 2.8G 533.

    What gives with these damn Celeron's anyway? Surely it is about time they were put to bed.

    Intel needs to lift their game a bit.
     
  2. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    the new celeron D's are not bad processors... not as good as AMD sempr0n's but still pretty good compared to their previous iteration...

    wrt naming Intel has decided to go away from a cpu speed based naming convention... the new names are arbitary basically with changes in model number specifying performance difference in that particular line... ie (random numbers here) 100 v/s a 101... its obvious the 101 is faster/more featured or whatever else than the 100 since it is a higher model number...

    this is the same arbitary stance AMD adopted with their opteron and FX line-ups (ie opteron 150/250/850 and fx-51/53)

    the opterons first number actual means something wrt SMP... 150 == single processor config... 250 == dual processor config...
     
  3. Hipster Doofus

    Hipster Doofus Good grief Charlie Brown

    Messages:
    5,920
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    I think I'll throw in the towel. :eek:

    Good explanation btw. :)