old 3DMark05 Benchmark Thread

Discussion in 'Benchmarks & Performance' started by Sazar, Sep 29, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    New benchmark :cool:, and a new thread for it. The following is the press release from FutureMarkl regarding their latest product.

    Minimum System Recommendations

    • DirectX 9 compatible graphics adapter with support for Pixel Shader 2.0 or later, and graphics memory of 128 MB or above.
    • Intel® or AMD® compatible processor running on 2 GHz or above.
    • 512 MB system memory or more.
    • 1.5 GB of free hard disk space.
    • Windows 2000 or XP operating system with the latest Service Packs and updates installed.
    • DirectX 9.0c runtime installed with the latest updates.
    • Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 installed, for some 3DMark functionality
    • Microsoft Excel 2000, 2003 or XP, for some 3DMark functionality.
    • Microsoft DirectX 9 Summer Update 2004 System Development Kit is required to run the image quality test using the reference rasterizer.

    It is possible that 3DMark05 will run on PCs that do not meet the requirements above, but the benchmark performance may be seriously affected. For example, insufficient video memory will result in texture swapping - this will cause fluctuations during the tests, reducing the reliability of the generated scores.

    Download Mirrors

    Post your 3DMark05 scores in this thread... please read the GUIDELINES before posting and ensure you follow the general posting convention listed to maximise uniformity.

    Thanks :)
     
  2. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    CPU: a64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
    Motherboard: Msi Neo Fis2r, bios rev == 1.8
    Memory: 2x512 Corsair XMS, ddr 400, timings == 2.5/3/3/7
    Video Card: ATi AIW 9700 pro, 324/310, cat 4.9's
    Hard drives: Dual Maxtor DM9's, 80gig each

    score == 2150
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=4638

    I will attempt a run with the 4.10's when the debut next month and will update accordingly...
     
  3. Taggert_LOA

    Taggert_LOA Modding Addict Political User

    Messages:
    479
    i scored an 800 dunno why, i'm not up on this stuff
     
  4. Sazar

    Sazar F@H - Is it in you? Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    14,905
    Location:
    Between Austin and Tampa
    please post in the stated format and with the link if possible :)

    keeps it cleaner... and also helps us to help you trouble-shoot to get a better score or pinpoint other problems...

    wrt your system I reckon the card and its memory bus (should be 64bit) are holding it back tremendously... hence the score..
     
  5. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    CPU: Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
    Motherboard: MSI Neo Fis2r, bios rev == 1.8
    Memory: 2x512 Crucial CAS3 DDR
    Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, 461/1170, Forceware 66.51
    Hard drives: Dual Maxtor DM9's, 160gig each

    Score == 5486
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=6991
     
  6. VenomXt

    VenomXt Blame me for the RAZR's Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,453
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    3dmark 2005 pro (standard defaults.)

    CPU: Athlon Xp 2600 @ 2ghz.
    Motherboard: AN7 1.X bios rev == 6.00 PG
    Memory: 2x512 Crucial XTM Pc 2700
    Video Card: ATI 9700 pro drivers: 6.14.10.6476
    Hard drives: 1 WD 120 (primary) 1 WD 250 gig (2 removable externals totaling 160 gigs)

    Score: 2172

    im assuming this is good since i got a bit higher than Sazar and his procc whippes my ass. I had just dont a clean install of XP as well.
     
  7. luish

    luish OSNN Senior Addict

    Messages:
    429
    Location:
    Israel
    Something weird here
    Pentium 4 2.8 HT
    ASUS P4S800D
    1 GB DDR 400
    Nvidia 5700 LE 256mb

    Score : 382 ? ? ?
     
  8. Tuffgong4

    Tuffgong4 The Donger Need Food!!!! Political User

    Messages:
    2,465
    Location:
    Chicago
    AMD 64 3000+
    Albatron K8X800 Pro II
    1 gig Corsair value 3200 Ram
    eVGA 6800 GT 380/1.02 GHZ
    120 GB WD special edition 8MB ata

    4765

    will post link when I get a chance to register and run it again
     
  9. mbx

    mbx Marathon Project

    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    AMD 2400 XP @2.0Ghz (standard speed)
    ASUS A7V8X (1014.001 BIOS)
    512 Mb PC2700 Ram
    XFX Geforce 6800 GT (standard clock speeds)
    2x Samsung SP1640 160Gb with 2Mb Cache each

    3716
     
  10. Petros

    Petros Thief IV

    Messages:
    3,038
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Nope, you're exactly where you should be. Take a look at the second image on this page.

    Oh yeah and this Ti4200 got you all beat.
     
  11. Tuffgong4

    Tuffgong4 The Donger Need Food!!!! Political User

    Messages:
    2,465
    Location:
    Chicago
  12. one.123

    one.123 -0-;;

    Messages:
    231
    CPU: AMD 64 FX-53 939
    MOBO: A8V deluxe v2.0
    GPU: BFG 6800 Ultra (61.77)
    memory: 2x512 DDR400

    score : 4101, does this score seem low for my system?
     
  13. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    one - perhaps... got a compare url?
     
  14. one.123

    one.123 -0-;;

    Messages:
    231
    no i don't the computer im using to test doesn't have an internet connection at the moment. but what could be the problem keeping the score low?
     
  15. Tuffgong4

    Tuffgong4 The Donger Need Food!!!! Political User

    Messages:
    2,465
    Location:
    Chicago
    are you running a lot of other things as you run this benchmark in the background?
     
  16. one.123

    one.123 -0-;;

    Messages:
    231
    nope nothing
     
  17. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Get us a compare URL once you got it plumbed in.
    Very strange :)
     
  18. one.123

    one.123 -0-;;

    Messages:
    231
    alrighty
     
  19. mbx

    mbx Marathon Project

    Messages:
    55
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    I just done a few upgrades.
    Here are how the changes affected 3DMark 2005
    Changed gfx drivers from 61.77 to 66.72 (3716 -> 4452) OMG (l33t h4x0ring in driver methinks!)
    Added another 512Mb (DDR333) no change
    Replaced XP 2400+ with XP 3000+ (standard clocks of 166/13) (4452 -> 4798)

    Will now try some service tweaks and oc the gfx card :)
     
  20. Electronic Punk

    Electronic Punk Administrator Staff Member Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    18,590
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Yeah got up to 5800 odd with 66.72, down a little with 66.81 - but positive... I think they should now refocus and get games rockin'
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.