March Desktops Captures - Post Them Here

[DFX]

jawshoouh where do you get those pictures from man. lush!

can you send me the .jpg of it please?

 

[Jewelzz]

Get those wallpapers while you can, jawshoouh is pushing the limit again

 

[jawshoouh]

before i get banned again for wallpapers that show no butt cracks or nips Link removed. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to get to the rest of the wallpapers, all of which are totally nekkid to get that heidi klum one (it's about 1MB) i just put up. and for the sake of prolonging my unbanning, i removed the thumbnail of the last one and left the text link.

 

[jawshoouh]

jesus y'all are hilarious. those of you who know where to find me, you can find me. consider this my last post. someone remove my acct pls, i'm sure one of you will enjoy it more than life itself...

 

[MdSalih]

Originally posted by andy_rose
Ahh, Rhapsodized Ivory by Dazzla

1280x1024

damn nice wallpaper... any chance i could get my hands on it m8 ?

Cheers

 

[Evil Marge]

Mine

 

[thebear]

taking full advantage of CHosenOS...aswell as a nice wallpaper from endlessss.com

 

[thebear]

you want to be banned eh?

 

[ZipTriX]

I think if you are going to set a standard on "nudity" why not say none at all, including partial? Meaning, no ass cracks, breasts, etc. The double standards and playing "I'm high and mighty so the rules don't apply to me" is completely stupid. It's ashame that this forum went from a "helping community" to "the community doesn't really matter, unless you're an ass kisser or a mod".
Prime example of the nonsense:

Originally posted by jawshoouh
Noir VS, Noir WinAMP skin, no icons, CoolMon runnin'

Originally posted by PseudoKiller
I see Jawshoouh wants to start pushing the limits again...

Sorry to see you go, jawshoouh.

 

[thebear]

k, what jawshoouh was completely out of the limits...like c'mon, posting that pic was asking to be banned (the post was deleted)

 

[PC-Dude]

Originally posted by Ziptrx
I think if you are going to set a standard on "nudity" why not say none at all, including partial? Meaning, no ass cracks, breasts, etc. The double standards and playing "I'm high and mighty so the rules don't apply to me" is completely stupid. It's ashame that this forum went from a "helping community" to "the community doesn't really matter, unless you're an ass kisser or a mod".

Sadly you have hit the nail on the head

 

[Jewelzz]

One of jawshoouh's desktop screenshots had a pic called Hello_Nurse, who was topless...against forum guidelines.
The link he posted contained several wallpapers of nude women, also against forum guidelines.
I didn't ban him, he took it upon himself to leave NTFS. All I asked was for him to abide by the guidelines like all member and staff do.

 

[renakuajo]

i have a similar problem in other site.........but its funny cause we are in 21th century and still we are afraid or get insulted just to see a girl nipple or an ass...... but we are more comfortable with war than w/our bodys.........funny,ah?


just been sexy

 

[Herkalees]

Going against the grain at will, no naked anything here:

One
And-a
Two

Wall: Entirely by me
Y'z Dock: PNG's edited to my liking
Trillin: Chosen OS skin
Samurize: Simple and clean
VS: Pure

The background behind the Y'z dock and Samurize is part of the wallpaper, not each program.

 

[Sublime]

Originally posted by Jewelzz
One of jawshoouh's desktop screenshots had a pic called Hello_Nurse, who was topless...against forum guidelines.
The link he posted contained several wallpapers of nude women, also against forum guidelines.
I didn't ban him, he took it upon himself to leave NTFS. All I asked was for him to abide by the guidelines like all member and staff do.

"Get those wallpapers while you can, jawshoouh is pushing the limit again"
"I see Jawshoouh wants to start pushing the limits again... "

Snide comments from admins didn't help the issue

I see this in the forum guidelines:

Pornographic Images – Any distasteful photographs or images containing explicit imagery. First offense will bring a warning to the member; second offense will result in a temporary ban for that member.

Yet I don't see a rule relating to the linking of such images, and as such, jaws gave warning as to what the link did in fact lead to. And fair warning to those clicking on the link as to what to expect. Twas a LINK in the second case, not an image.

 

[TBone]

My Desktop

Here it is, tell me what you think:

 

[ZipTriX]

I never agreed with anything he had done. I simply stated a point that is true. How does showing a whole ass differ from showing a whole nipple, when both are considered nudity? The rules are bias. Simple as that.

 

[renakuajo]

Pornographic Images – Any distasteful photographs or images containing explicit imagery. First offense will bring a warning to the member; second offense will result in a temporary ban for that member.

rulez are rulez...but distasteful photographs is something questionable.........some one puking is distasteful but a tit or an ass??? come on..............again for some people something like war is ok but some nudity is distatesful....weird.......



explicit???

how come a nude picture from davinci or some old weirdo is ok but a pretty nude girl is wrong?????

 

[NetRyder]

Originally posted by renakuajo
rulez are rulez

Exactly, so follow them.

but a tit or an ass???

... is considered sexually explicit, and against the rules of the forum. Not every member is over 18 on this board. Respect that fact, and keep it clean.

come on..............again for some people something like war is ok but some nudity is distatesful....weird.......

War is not distasteful ... rather, it's debatable, and discussions are good - they let people express their opinions.

how come a nude picture from davinci or some old weirdo is ok but a pretty nude girl is wrong?????

Find me one post on this board that contains a nude painting by DaVinci, or whatever you mean by "old weirdos."

 

[PseudoKiller]

Where to go with this oh where to go. First off, to compare War pictures to a half naked women or man is an analogy that is so unjustified I cant even comprehend it, let alone how unfair it is.
With out playing the blame game here’s the essence of it. As best I can explain. Now to say you do not find pictures of naked women offence does not mean we can suddenly just post every picture that playboy has ever taken. The forum has rules. They rules are also there to protect the owner of the site. Posting things that are copyrighted or things that crack other programs is against the law in many countries, and I think you would agree that we don’t want the law coming after Waddy for something some irresponsible user posted. In the same sense exposing a child or under age adults to pictures is considered against the law also. Its called contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Now with that said, do you feel the need to post more material that could get others into trouble. You talk about a community but are you willing to abide by the rules or is everything about you and your needs and wants. Is it really that much of a sacrifice to not post pictures of women wearing nothing more than a smile.
You talk a good talk. But let see how you deal with more than yourself and you needs. You are a member and welcome here any time. But you say community, do you know what it truly means to be part of a community. Thank you for your time. Enjoy the forums.