Mainframeguy
Debiant by way of Ubuntu
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2002
- Messages
- 3,763
Sorry Xie - speaking as a software developer I totally disagree. They will IMHO have fuly intended things to turn our EXACTLY as they have! There is some ignorance in your post, because if code is "commented out" then it only remains in the SOURCE and here we are talking about EXECUTABLES. The spource is never shipped and cannot be "turned on" or compiled.
So internally they will have implemented a switch or added branches to jump around the "hot coffee" executables, this in order that they are shipped but not executed (attaining the desired rating)... then later it is not hard to leak or have crackers discover the necessary alterations - removing Roxtars liability for the switching on and giving them tons and tons of free publicity.
So internally they will have implemented a switch or added branches to jump around the "hot coffee" executables, this in order that they are shipped but not executed (attaining the desired rating)... then later it is not hard to leak or have crackers discover the necessary alterations - removing Roxtars liability for the switching on and giving them tons and tons of free publicity.