A ? about adding a 2nd hard drive

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by rj2, Jun 13, 2003.

  1. rj2

    rj2 Guest

    by adding a 2nd hd as slave on the same controller as the master drive affect performance at all,of the master drive,which is a new wd 8mb cache.
    thnx
     
  2. Un4gIvEn1

    Un4gIvEn1 Moderator

    Messages:
    1,084
    rj2: That is one hell of a "runon" sentance. I does not make any sense. I have an idea of what you are trying to ask, but so that I don't waste time, can you rephrase it?
     
  3. roban

    roban Guest

    He wants to know if adding a slave HD will affect the overall performance of his master. The only way i can see that happening is if the voltage required by the new drive is so high that it drops the overall voltage. i had that happen to me with my USB ports after adding a 127GB slave. But I simply installed a powered USB hub. I hope this answers the question.
     
  4. rj2

    rj2 Guest

    thnx for replies,and i apologize for my bad sentencing structure.roban answered my ?.i dont think i have to worry about voltage drops,as i run two psu`s in my case.
    enermax 350 main,250 for cathodes & fans,and pump relay switch for water pump
     
  5. Taurus

    Taurus hardware monkey

    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    some people say that the whole ide chanel will run at the speed of the slowest drive on the channel. i don't believe this. for instance, if you have an ata133 master... and connect an ata100 slave, your ata133 drive will now be running at ata100. but like i siad, i don't think this is true. xp picks up both drives running at their respective speeds.

    though, i can believe that it is a little more efficient if both drives are the same speed... so the controller doesn't have to switch modes when going from one hd to the other.

    anyone know for sure or have evidence?
     
  6. yoyo

    yoyo _________________

    Messages:
    1,557
    Some people say that?
    It is repeated over and over again. I don't believe it either (not a hardware expert, though).

    :)
     
  7. rj2

    rj2 Guest

    for what its worth,both drives are ATA100
     
  8. Zedric

    Zedric NTFS Guru Folding Team

    Messages:
    4,006
    Location:
    Sweden
    You won't see any performance degradation. The "slowest drive decides" has been true for a long time, but it seems newer chipsets can handle different speeds (like yoyo said). It takes time for the masses to relearn a negated fact like this one. :)
     
  9. Gus K

    Gus K NTFS abuser

    Messages:
    380
    Location:
    USA
    That might be a problem with some PIO and UDMA devices, but not with HD's. And ATA 66, ATA100, or ATA133 makes no difference as no HD can even exceed the ATA66 spec yet. But an ATA100 or ATA133 drive will perform better than an ATA66 drive simply because of newer technology.
     
  10. Taurus

    Taurus hardware monkey

    Messages:
    3,206
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    newer chipsets? my 3-year-old kt133 board supports it. ;)