WINAMP 3 or MUSICMATCH JUKEBOX PLUS ???

[macthemac]

Wich one of these are the best ?
All opinions are welcome.
Thank you.
mac...

 

[beatlesdb]

I have been using Music Jukebox for about 3 years - have always found it a fantasic CD to Mp3 converter. But as a media player - I found it too slow and clumsy.
Winamp 3 if the best audio player - but Idon't have it set-up to play video (that's what Media Player is for).
I think that the more they try to cram into Jukebox and Winamp - the more bloated they will become.

 

[neoterixx]

I like WINAMP3, Jukebox is not free....

 

[existenz]

IMO, I still like Winamp2 better than Winamp3. I think Winamp3 takes up too many resources for an audio player, and takes a pretty long time to start up for me.

 

[INFERNO2K]

Winamp 2.80 > 3

 

[JJB6486]

Winamp 2.8

JJB

 

[Cosmin]

winamp3 still contents some bugs , 2.80 is perfect for u ..

 

[Electronic Punk]

Winamp3 has only just been released tho, winamp2 has been around for years, one day winamp3 will be incredible... I still prefer it over 2 tho, skins and transparency are much cooler.

 

[dreamliner77]

Use winamp. Version 2.81 is out now, it is the way to go. As far as ripping goes. Use EAC and LAME. Musicmatch makes sh**ty mp3's. Use --alt-preset in Lame and compare. you will see what I mean

 

[SaintKaden]

you want winamp 3...

it's stil new but the features are awesome, specially the media library feature. this **** arranges everything the way I always wanted it do it.

 

[Sinister]

I prefer Winamp 2.8...tried Winamp3....didnt like it.

 

[mbunny]

Transparent FX... Transparency for Winamp 2 =)

http://www.draconpern.com/TransparentFX/