umm no this is not cool

[the_music_man]

um a mod just closed down shorty's thread and thats not cool. he also changed the guidelines to say that "porno can be accepted in sigs as long as its taseful" that is realy crap and this site is geting crappier if things like this happen....what happened to sovereignty (however you spell it)? andd don't tell me shut up b/c i have a point here and i don't know why its so blind to everyone.

 

[Nick M]

Whatever. I'm sick of threads going along this topic.

Electronic Punk, close this too!

 

[Iceman]

nah this is a Iceman job

Closed for lack of thought

Thread wasn't closed because of Nick_M's request he has no say here in regards the closing or opening of threads.

also would request nobody request a thread to be closed, let the mods do the job, you should just hit the report this link and make your case on whats the problem and keep it private.

 

[Electronic Punk]

I closed the therad and I updated the guidelines and I don't care.
Cheers.

There was an issue with my constantly-updated guidelines, which has now been rectified. (the changes were in red)

 

[gonaads]

Originally posted by Electronic Punk
I closed the therad and I updated the guidelines and I don't care.
Cheers.

There was an issue with my constantly-updated guidelines, which has now been rectified. (the changes were in red)

I actually like the changes that you made E Punk.



And as for you Almostfamous88,

This is what the Forum Guidelines say:

Pornographic Images – Any distasteful photographs or images containing explicit imagery. First offense will bring a warning to the member; second offense will result in a temporary ban for that member.

And this is what the Signature Guideline says:

Please keep your signature below a combined total of 75kb for images with dimensions less than 200 height and 500 width.

Your signature must also conform to the other forum guidelines.

Nowwhere does it say that "porno can be accepted in sigs as long as its taseful". As you have stated.