Should the Sigs be limited?

[Burpster]

looks good to me

 

[jumpy]

Pornographic Images – Any photographic containing nude or semi nude images will be deleted. First offense will bring a warning to the member; second offense will result in banning of that member.

ITS ALREADY IN THE GUIDELINES!!!

To what do you want to limit it to exactly?!?! maybe a picture of a cute girl and a puppy?

I want the mods to act on their guidelines. The key line, is "nude or semi nude" Thats what a lot of the sigs are. Can't anyone see that?

Maybe we should drop this issue completely, since everyone is getting irritated just talking about it :huh:

By the forum results it looks like members want something done, no matter how many influential members are in the "No - Give me more skin" category. I think benny's idea of reporting offending sigs to a moderator is a good idea but don't you think mods should take the initiative and remove offensive sigs themselves, afterall, they are the deciding party.

 

[Majin]

ya they prolly do need some limitation as i have on several ocasion now had to close the window and stop reading because smaller children came around i dont mind it terribly myself but its embarrasing to have to explain that its not me thats a perv.

 

[the_music_man]

jewellz im disappointed at you. you break the guidelines... no offense but your sig the best example of a sig that should be limited, b/c it actully shows a body part. all the others just have girls in bikinis but yours is very close to full nudity

 

[the_music_man]

(Pornographic Images – Any photographic containing nude or semi nude images will be deleted. First offense will bring a warning to the member; second offense will result in banning of that member. )

 

[Electronic Punk]

I must admit, I do like seeing semi-nude women on sigs, but only if it looks artistic, if it looks messy and is just an attempt, its a tough call, so like someone said, if you do see an offensive signature PM a mod.

Personally I don't think some dudes ass counts, as we have this advert over here for some aftershave with this dude running round his house naked, then he gets a cup of tea and thinks he is the mutts nutts.

To show the teams stance on this, I believe, the guys have agreed not to have any semi-clads in their sigs. This is afterall a site for all ages (cept anyone of 13 or under), saw Species when I was 13.. ooh that natasha.

 

[the_music_man]

you can't bend the rules for a pic that has a guys butt, its still nudity/semi nudity just like hte guidline says. the constituion doesn't work like this you know. of course inless they get an amendment. haha, don't you brits have an unwritten constitution? so i guess it wouldn't apply to u? by the way...is waddy a brit or american?

 

[damnyank]

Would someone please PM a mod before I post this as my Sig????


<edit - go ahead an delete this post- I was just trying to prove a point>

 

[Electronic Punk]

strange how this wasn't an issue when it was nekkid ladies butt, but I am looking at the guidelines now, as this is just getting daft.

 

[the_music_man]

to telll you the truth ep i haven't seen one ladies butt yet but if i did i would still agree to limit the sigs with shorty

 

[the_music_man]

Originally posted by damnyank
Would someone please PM a mod before I post this as my Sig????


<edit - go ahead an delete this post- I was just trying to prove a point>

i feel like laughing but its not coming out. sorry damnyank

 

[Electronic Punk]

http://www.ntfs.org/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=111065#post111065

Forum Guidelines have now been updated, among them, signature's nudity is now under the moderators definition of tasteful.

Before you accuse me of twisting the guidelines, I wrote the guidelines and I am supposed to update the guidelines - thats a guidelines you know.