Renaming Symantec Ghost 8.2 Server

G

gh057

Guest
when i rename the ghost server , the ghost console clients looks for the old ghost server name. any ideas on how i can fix this problem?

Note: the server ip is static ( pretty obvious :p )

thanks
 
Last edited:
I would think you need to remap the clients to the new named server
 
when i rename the ghost server , the ghost console clients looks for the old ghost server name. any ideas on how i can fix this problem?

The name of the server is embedded in the public key certificate file (pubkey.crt), and the name remembered there is the one that the server was first installed on; the primary identifier the clients search for isn't the name, however, that's mainly for display purposes. The primary method clients use to locate the server is via a multicast query that includes a cryptographic challenge, and as long as the public/private keys still match up (which they will) then all will be well.

Now, the old machine name may come into play if you have configured your network such that IP multicasting is disabled, in which case the clients fall back to trying to locate the server using WINS. But even then, the server should detect that the current name is different than the original name and will add NetBIOS name registrations for both the old and new names. So, things still should work despite the machine renaming.

A good check to run is to use nbtstat -n on the server machine, where you should see ConfigServer<1C> as a group name, and something like OldServerName<2D> and NewServerName<2D> as unique names. If the clients can't locate the server using multicast, they will do NetBIOS queries for the old server name and then authenticate the server, so check to see that the server is registering both names.

If things aren't working and the clients aren't finding the server, you should leave a message at Symantec's Ghost forums. Solving this may involve digging a bit into your network configuration (particularly your switches and whether your network is multicast-capable or not) and possibly getting a packet trace using a tool like Wireshark so the developers (i.e., me) can dig deeper.

- Nigel.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Also Hi EP and people. I found this place again while looking through a oooollllllldddd backup. I have filled over 10TB and was looking at my collection of antiques. Any bids on the 500Mhz Win 95 fix?
Any of the SP crew still out there?
Xie wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Impressed you have kept this alive this long EP! So many sites have come and gone. :(

Just did some crude math and I apparently joined almost 18yrs ago, how is that possible???
hello peeps... is been some time since i last came here.
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Rest in peace my friend, been trying to find you and finally did in the worst way imaginable.

Forum statistics

Threads
62,015
Messages
673,494
Members
5,621
Latest member
naeemsafi
Back