Page File question

Xie

- geek -
Joined
29 Sep 2003
Messages
5,275
If you go by the "standard" most sites/ppl will say 1.5x your RAM. I think w/ XP though it is thought that letting XP handle this is the best method. One thing you could do though if you run more then one HD is set it on the faster of the 2 or if the same speed on the non-OS HD.
 

LeeJend

OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined
25 Jan 2003
Messages
5,291
Xie said:
I think w/ XP though it is thought that letting XP handle this is the best method. One thing you could do though if you run more then one HD is set it on the faster of the 2 or if the same speed on the non-OS HD.

Bad ideas:
1). If xp handles it,it will smear it all over your HD as it adjusts the size dynamically causing major fragementation and slow downs.

2). If you put it on a physically different HD than your operating system you will have to wait a couple seconds for the 2nd HD to spin up out of power down mode every time you need to access the pagefile.

Alternate:
1). Set the pagefile size to fixed. In your case from 768 to 1.5x768 will work. The old 1.5x advice dates back to when RAM was only 128meg and I'm not sure it makes sense anymore. The pagefiles are getting so large now it will take longer to access them.
2). Put your system on a small partition (8-10meg) which makes the access faster. Put the pagefile on the small system partition or on another dedicated partion on the drive. (I do the latter).
 

j79zlr

Glaanies script monkey
Political Access
Joined
16 Feb 2003
Messages
2,725
LeeJend said:
Bad ideas:
1). If xp handles it,it will smear it all over your HD as it adjusts the size dynamically causing major fragementation and slow downs.

2). If you put it on a physically different HD than your operating system you will have to wait a couple seconds for the 2nd HD to spin up out of power down mode every time you need to access the pagefile.

1) This does not happen, if XP handles the page file, it automatically sets its size to 1.5x's RAM and will expand if necessary.

2) The most optimal page file placement is on a seperate hard drive on a seperate controller. The disk will never have to spin up as it will be constantly accessed.

3) There is no huge performance increase with setting the pagefile correctly, for some reason someone somehow started the idea that there can be massive performance increase involved with the PF, when this is just not the case.

4) Rule of thumb, if you are going to set a PF size, never set it to less than the amount of RAM installed.

5) Just let windoze manage it, no reason not too, and no performance increase by doing otherwize.
 

Perris Calderon

dealer
Staff member
Political Access
Joined
24 Jan 2002
Messages
12,378
ya leejand

j79's post is correct

the fragmented pagefile thing most sites used to claim happens cannot possibly happen...once your pagefile is contiguous is HAS to remain contiguous on a healthy drive

this includes a pagefile that windows manages
 

dreamliner77

The Analog Kid
Joined
16 Mar 2002
Messages
4,716
perris-
wouldn't this be a wonderful time to post your awesome paper on the subject?
 

ming

OSNN Advanced
Joined
17 Jun 2003
Messages
4,252
Mine has always been constant at 768MB. However, because I have 3 XP's installed on my machine, all the page files are on drive C: :p When I defrag, I see a really huge yellow mark showing the space that the page files has occupied.

I've thought about setting the page file to zero, but not sure what effect it will have on the performance of XP.
 
L

Lee

Guest
Me I have 3 partitions, 768 on c, 768 on d and on e 1234.

System is fine working that way.
 
L

Lee

Guest
I forgot to add I have a ram drive also, which I base my internet explorer downlaod files on.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Xie wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Impressed you have kept this alive this long EP! So many sites have come and gone. :(

Just did some crude math and I apparently joined almost 18yrs ago, how is that possible???
hello peeps... is been some time since i last came here.
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Rest in peace my friend, been trying to find you and finally did in the worst way imaginable.
Terrahertz wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Yo fellas!
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Where are you buddy?

Forum statistics

Threads
62,005
Messages
673,461
Members
5,600
Latest member
CoraPiper