I knew that there was one, and that ASUS made it but i never knew anyone that has/had one and if they liked it, and how video performance was and so forth. The new one is supposed to be amazing.Originally posted by b-man__
i never really knew there was an nforce !! lol
They are releasing two types of barods, one with and one without. I would buy the one without because of the performance. finally this will smoke PC800.Originally posted by Zedric
Only problem (so far) is that the integrated graphics on the nForce2 is going to be GeForce 4 MX. MX?!
Pretty cool with dual NIC:s though... Pretty useless as well... (unless you want it as router)
My point is that if they make the Ti instead you can acctually use it. What point is there to have a crappy builtin card when you can have a good one (except from the very narrow usage above)? Take the first nForce. The builtin GF2GTS was one of the faster cards around then. Now that was a usefull builtin! Besides, I don't think nVidia would use Intel graphics on their own board. And with an AMD CPU at that. I just hope the chipset can deliver what it promisses this time. The first nForce was slower than the KT266 (or 133 don't remeber) that was the available alternative at the time.Originally posted by scriptasylum
I personally think an integrated GF4 MX is a pretty good step; after all, it IS integrated. Much better than Intel's graphic chipset! Great for those who ruin a Ti by overclocking/overheating ...at least you can revert back to the built-in graphics and still have decent performance.
nForce is good for a cheap PC, I would prefer a decent Audio card and gfx card though