Making a apache server

What's there to talk about? It's funny to learn, you are never out of resources (disc space), you can upgrade whenever you want and you even redirect a domain name to it. One major downside is still security. You need a good firewall, else you'll be flooded and your connection blocked etc. This has happened to me several times and luckily the manufacturer of my router brought out a new firmware with upgrades to the hardware firewall. That has saved me many times.
 
Fun OS X Feature: To get apache up and running, all you need to do is tick a box. no arsing about with configs 😉

glaanie's right though, setup a good firewall, don't want outside connections to it (or do you? o_0)
 
SPeedY_B said:
Fun OS X Feature: To get apache up and running, all you need to do is tick a box. no arsing about with configs 😉

What's the fun in that? 😛
 
No, this is just on my computer, Type this in on another computer: http://localhost/ and you'll proably get nothing! But on my comp you'll see a Apache server test page.
 
ViperSnake said:
No, this is just on my computer, Type this in on another computer: http://localhost/ and you'll proably get nothing! But on my comp you'll see a Apache server test page.
Really? I see an apache test page too!!!! How about that..
 
I see three different forums running on three different forum platforms.
 
image.php
😛
 
wow, its the loopback interface.

127.0.0.1 was origionally created to test the loopback interface, after that people decided that binding local services was a good idea, and that is how the name localhost, or localhost.localdomain came about.
 
xsivforce said:
I see three different forums running on three different forum platforms.
NOT! I only have 1 test forum running this php flat file database board called UPB. I don't have MySQL running yet.
 
ViperSnake said:
NOT! I only have 1 test forum running this php flat file database board called UPB. I don't have MySQL running yet.
He wasn't talking about you.
 
Vipersnake: if your are in linux: rm -rf /, if you are in windows deltree c:\*.* /y

Thank you 🙂
 
now now x-istence, deltree isn't supported in XP, so that should be rmdir c:\* /s
 
j79zlr said:
now now x-istence, deltree isn't supported in XP, so that should be rmdir c:\* /s

Sorry sir, havnt used Windows since i last newfs -t ufs2 -<parameters> it 😛.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
62,021
Messages
673,242
Members
5,640
Latest member
Kgkass
Back
Top