leadtek fx5600 256 3dmark03 scores

#1
HI just bought a fx5600 256 card,only x4agp cause my board is only x4.What scores roughly should i be getting?
asus a7v333
xp2500 barton
512pc2700
audigy card
2x40gb maxtor drives
plex rewriter

first go i got 2498 score.
is that about right.Thanks
 

Teddy

Boogie Nights...!
#2
Cant you compare your results to people with the same/similar PC as yours on the FutureMark website??

I'm sure that's one of its features.
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
#3
Originally posted by kingsam
HI just bought a fx5600 256 card,only x4agp cause my board is only x4.What scores roughly should i be getting?
asus a7v333
xp2500 barton
512pc2700
audigy card
2x40gb maxtor drives
plex rewriter

first go i got 2498 score.
is that about right.Thanks
yes that sounds about right... and no the agp 4x board will not cause any noticeable loss in performance... even in benchmarks...
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
#5
Originally posted by prodj88
hey sazar if i have a ti4200 and the same specs as him will i get higher than that score?
no...

he has a dx9 card... he can run game test 4... you can't... :)

therefore straight away he will get better scores than you... no matter what happens if he compares HIS scores with YOUR scores and everything else remains the same..

in 3dmark2001se... you might be a lot closer though...
 

Taurus

hardware monkey
#6
Originally posted by prodj88
hey sazar if i have a ti4200 and the same specs as him will i get higher than that score?
like sazar said, is score will be higher... but if you look at the individual test scores (game test 1, 2, 3), you might be higher. especially in game test 1 (all dx7). test 2 and 3 are both dx8 but with dx9 pixel shading techniques.. so dx8 cards get screwed even there.

these are all reasons why i don't go by 2003. i continue to use 2001.
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
#7
Originally posted by taurus
test 2 and 3 are both dx8 but with dx9 pixel shading techniques..
I dun think thats right m8 :)

gt 2 and 3 both use ps 1.4 (fallback to 1.1) and this is certainly not ps 2.0 (dx9)

only gt4 uses any dx9 features and that too only in some places (namely water and sky with ps 2.0)

ergo... gt2 and 3 are not dx9 in any way... they are certainly dx8 tests however... and IIRC the nv31 has fallback from ps2.0 to 1.3/1.1 therefore the performance should be the same as or worse than a 4200... of course this depends on whether the board is an ultra or not... and ultra should be the same as or faster than the 4200...

http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030311/geforcefx-5600-5200-16.html

this is a small sample of results... bear in mind this is the unpatched version of 3dmark03 (ie nvidia optimizations still in effect for gf FX gpu's)... but gives an indication of the performance expected in that setup (remove around 15-20% from the 5600 score for an accurate idea of its performance relative to the 4200)
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Ep, glad to see you come back and tidy up...did want to ask a one day favor, I want to enhance my resume , was hoping you could make me administrator for a day, if so, take me right off since I won't be here to do anything, and don't know the slightest about the board, but it would be nice putting "served administrator osnn", if can do, THANKS

Been running around Quora lately, luv it there https://tinyurl.com/ycpxl
Electronic Punk wrote on Perris Calderon's profile.
All good still mate?
Hello, is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me ...
Xie
What a long strange trip it's been. =)

Forum statistics

Threads
61,971
Messages
673,300
Members
89,016
Latest member
Poseeut