Ghost or Drive Image?

  • Thread starter robin.munro
  • Start date
R

robin.munro

Guest
Which would you say is the better, not so much for speed, more reliability...

Norton Ghost 2002
Drive Image 2002

Ta
 
My opinion is, that they are both reliable. But, for use at home, Drive Image is the better choice. It's got enough functions for your basic (disaster) needs. And it's very easy to use. But you can't use it over a network.
So, for the more heavy duty stuff (installing an image on 500 pc's!), i would recommend Ghost.
 
I used Ghost 7.5 Corporate Edition.
The boot floppy is all thats needed to make and restore backups.
 
Drive Image

I have bought nearly all the versions of Drive Image and really like them. Simple to run. I just bought the NEW "Drive Image 2002" which can now do disk to disk copying/cloning within Windows. Take a look at this new program!
 
Hell, I tried using drive image 5.0 to do a disk to disk copy for new drive. When finished, program said that it had hidden old drive partitions and made new drive partitions active, but upon reboot no drives recognized, period. Went through hell and ended up doing a clean install of xp, losing all of my good stuff developed over months of use, etc.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest profile posts

Also Hi EP and people. I found this place again while looking through a oooollllllldddd backup. I have filled over 10TB and was looking at my collection of antiques. Any bids on the 500Mhz Win 95 fix?
Any of the SP crew still out there?
Xie wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Impressed you have kept this alive this long EP! So many sites have come and gone. :(

Just did some crude math and I apparently joined almost 18yrs ago, how is that possible???
hello peeps... is been some time since i last came here.
Electronic Punk wrote on Sazar's profile.
Rest in peace my friend, been trying to find you and finally did in the worst way imaginable.

Forum statistics

Threads
62,015
Messages
673,494
Members
5,621
Latest member
naeemsafi
Back