N
Nedreplan
Guest
I keep reading the reviews on Geforce FX 5600 and compare it with Ti 4200 and 4600...
In many ways and words it sounds like the "Ti"-cards are better, only the FX 5900 can truly kick them, or??...
The "Ti"-cards have better fill rate, but do the "FX"-cards balance that up in another way? And how much do the CineFX do on older games? And The AA doesn't seem too top notch on the "FX"-cards..but are they better on the "Ti"-cards? or...
Who will actually gain on exchanging the "Ti"-card to a "FX"-card, 5600 or 5200...? I can understand that the 5900 is a different matter.......
In many ways and words it sounds like the "Ti"-cards are better, only the FX 5900 can truly kick them, or??...
The "Ti"-cards have better fill rate, but do the "FX"-cards balance that up in another way? And how much do the CineFX do on older games? And The AA doesn't seem too top notch on the "FX"-cards..but are they better on the "Ti"-cards? or...
Who will actually gain on exchanging the "Ti"-card to a "FX"-card, 5600 or 5200...? I can understand that the 5900 is a different matter.......