Futuremark's 3DMark 2001 SE Benchmarks

Electronic Punk

willalwaysbewithyou
Staff member
Political User
#1
3DMark®2001 SE Pro (build 330) is the latest installment (hah! - punk) in the popular 3DMark series. By combining DirectX®8.1 support with completely new graphics, it continues to provide benchmark results that empower you to make informed hardware assessments. The game tests, texturing tests, filtering tests, image quality tests, and others give you an overview of your system’s current performance and show you what kind of performance you could expect if you were to upgrade your PC.

You can download 3DMark 2001 SE from this page

Please use my next thread as a template for your benchmarks.
Thanks.
 

Electronic Punk

willalwaysbewithyou
Staff member
Political User
#2
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3400+ @ 2.2ghz
Motherboard: MSI Neo FiS2R, Bios rev 1.8
Memory: 2x512meg Crucial CAS3 DDR
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb, Forceware 61.77
Hard drives: Dual SATA Maxtor Diamond9's 320gig RAID array
Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS

3DMark Results:

Date: 2004-08-01
System Test: 23696 3DMarks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8014559
 

Electronic Punk

willalwaysbewithyou
Staff member
Political User
#4
Very impressed with it.
Not only is it faster than my AthlonXP 3000+, its cooler (in both senses), was alot easier to install (can't really go wrong) but I also believe the power consumption is lower.

To say its cooler, if the temp goes above 40c I start to wonder whats wrong. Usually dances between 25 and 35. It would be lower, but my graphics card is doing a grand job of warming things up at 64c (case is therefore about 35-40c)
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
#6
he just doesn't use Cool 'n' Quiet much :)

seriously though its a very nice cpu and does run cooler than my old AXP processor...

toss-up in temps between my p4 C and this but with cnq running, its much cooler... and it doesn't heat up to as high a temp...
 

Electronic Punk

willalwaysbewithyou
Staff member
Political User
#7
I do use cool and quiet, the problem is that I don't have the stock fan anymore.
So at the expense of buying a watercooling system, its fast, cool and quiet :)
 

Sazar

F@H - Is it in you?
Staff member
Political User
#8
have you looked into the new 7700CU fan from zalman?

its pretty nice and uses a 120mm fan instead of the 92 with the older one :)
 

Moonwraith

OSNN Veteran Addict
#9
Quite rare to find a motherboard to fit it.. or at least my small knowledge of motherboards. Doesn't fit the Neo2 platinum :( Got my 7000b-CU sitting here waiting for a motherboard. I'm not sure how much more weight/size a motherboard could take :D
 

LeeJend

OSNN Veteran Addict
#11
CPU: Barton 2500 W/FSB @ 182mhz, actual clock 2.1 mhz
Motherboard: ECS NF2000U
Memory: 768 meg 7,2,2,2.5 spektek (2) & micron (1), Clock at 182 FSB
Video Card: ATI RAdeon 9800 PRO, core 378 / memory 362, Catalyst 4.12
Hard drives: WD 120 gig 7200 RPM
Soundcard: SBlive

15877 3D marks, I feel so inadequate...

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8375281

It was interesting running 2001 again. The benchmark didn't go up much over this system using a 9500 Pro but graphics detail seems much more vivid, especially in the nature tests.
 

Moonwraith

OSNN Veteran Addict
#12
CPU: AMD AthlonXP 2200+
Motherboard: Asus A7v333
Memory: 2x512meg value select corsair PC2700
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce Ti4200 64Mb
Soundcard: Soundblaster Audigy

9009 3D marks

Now who's inadequate? :)
 
#14
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe
Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5
Video Card: 9600 se

9939 3D Marks
 
#15
CPU: AMD Athlon64 3800+ @ 2.4ghz
Motherboard: Asus A8v Deluxe
Memory: 2x512meg corsair XMS XL PRO 2-2-2-5
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce 6800 Ultra 256mb 66.93

22949 3d Marks
 

Moonwraith

OSNN Veteran Addict
#19
CPU: Athlon64 3500+ Winchester @ 2.2ghz
Mobo: MSI Neo2 Platinum
RAM: 2x512 Corsair XMS Twin-X CL2 Pro PC3200
GPU: BFG Geforce 6800 Ultra OC

Score: 22251

9009 to 22251 in a day
I'm quite happy :)
 
#20
do ya'll realize how bogus 3dmark is? i mean if u do extensive research on it, you will see how bogus it is. examples are higher end spec'd pc's are being beat by older lower end pc's. i mean c'mon, how can lower end machines beat higher end machines? biggest example is the game benchs. you see 9800pros beating 6800's in the game benches, but the 6800 beats the 9800pro in the other test, bump map, single/multi fill rates and so on. here is one comparison, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5830983. how can a 9700 with only an AXP1800 beat my Barton core AXP3000 w/6800, keep in mind also my 6800 is unlocked 16/6. not the standard 12/5. my conclusion, 3dmrk is not reliable at any form. these test comparisons clearly show this. this link is not the only one either. there are many showing results like this.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Perris Calderon wrote on Electronic Punk's profile.
Ep, glad to see you come back and tidy up...did want to ask a one day favor, I want to enhance my resume , was hoping you could make me administrator for a day, if so, take me right off since I won't be here to do anything, and don't know the slightest about the board, but it would be nice putting "served administrator osnn", if can do, THANKS

Been running around Quora lately, luv it there https://tinyurl.com/ycpxl
Electronic Punk wrote on Perris Calderon's profile.
All good still mate?
Hello, is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me ...
Xie
What a long strange trip it's been. =)

Forum statistics

Threads
61,970
Messages
673,297
Members
89,017
Latest member
Poseeut