I am against the concept that you shell out almost 200.00 USA dollars and people CANNOT OWN that copy of the software but purchased a license. Why? Well, probably more people got Win Me off the web than bought it.
Certainly to this day there is copy of XP PRO on a board I visit that has nothing to do with it, for members. So what do you pay for in my mind? Support. Updates. Some act like "I bought it so you must too!"
Hey I bought hundreds if not thousands of dollars worth of OEM and store branded software from MS. And I don't care if someone actually downloads that goofy version of XP CORP.
Microsoft is being ripped off in the far east far more than here or say the UK. My theory is simple, if previous versions of Windows were no good, then in 2 years my copy will be no good. How about a refund MS? Naw, never happen. It should amuse all that WIN2k was circulated and still is and doesn't have this cliche of PRO WPA folks.
So I agree with both sides. If not for the WPA thing I'd be on the side of those the bought XP only.
I sure hope that anyone including me that has a leaked copy of SP1 knows that it has code in it to tell MS WHO leaked it!
This is the thing I oppose. Why not enjoy the free beta testers?
AND if anyone knows if I can copy my Service Pack folder to a CDR and run it on another legit computer, please let me know! : )
--Rich