NetRyder said:BitTorrent works differently from other traditional P2P software. You don't need to specifically enable sharing of files. While you are downloading a particular file, you are also uploading parts of it to other people. Even after your download is complete, you will continue to upload the file to other users until you explicitly cancel it or close the window.
Basically, "seeders" are people who have finished downloading the entire file and are serving it to the rest, while "leechers" are people who are downloading the file, but are also uploading the part that they have already downloaded to other people (hope that made sense? 😛)
And AFAIK, there isn't a "share rating" as such in BitTorrent, but I could be mistaken.
'm behind a firewall/NAT, can I use BitTorrent?
Yes, but you will get better performance if other peers can connect to you. By default, BitTorrent listens on port 6881, trying incrementially higher ports if it's unable to bind, and gives up after 6889 (the port range is configurable). It's up to you to figure out how to poke a hole in your firewall/NAT.
Johnny said:BT is the slowest and most stressful downloader there is. I tried to download Red Hat with it, I waited three days for it to even start and this is with it saying it had over 2500. When it did start it went about 10% and just died. It reminded me of the gnutella network. Needless to see I came to the conclusion that it sux just like gnutella. Now if you have about a month to wait for the download to start or finish then it's deff for you. Otherwise I would advise staying away from it 🙂 You can get the Os's faster from their respected sites or you can go to regular distro and use an ftp. You would get them downloaded by the time BT even starts to download
Johnny said:BT is the slowest and most stressful downloader there is. I tried to download Red Hat with it, I waited three days for it to even start and this is with it saying it had over 2500. When it did start it went about 10% and just died. It reminded me of the gnutella network. Needless to see I came to the conclusion that it sux just like gnutella. Now if you have about a month to wait for the download to start or finish then it's deff for you. Otherwise I would advise staying away from it 🙂 You can get the Os's faster from their respected sites or you can go to regular distro and use an ftp. You would get them downloaded by the time BT even starts to download
So true. After I formatted and activated my firewall, I tried to grab a torrent, and kept getting tracker errors, realised the next day I hadn't added the filter to my firewall.. voilla full-speed downloads 🙂NetRyder said:Did you try opening the ports on your router/firewall. See dax-'s post above yours. Unopened ports are usually the main cause for sluggish downloads on BT.
your either not opening ports or your not sharing back ... you may have gotten a bad torrent but I doubt you could get a bad official RH torrent 🙁Johnny said:BT is the slowest and most stressful downloader there is. I tried to download Red Hat with it, I waited three days for it to even start and this is with it saying it had over 2500. When it did start it went about 10% and just died. It reminded me of the gnutella network. Needless to see I came to the conclusion that it sux just like gnutella. Now if you have about a month to wait for the download to start or finish then it's deff for you. Otherwise I would advise staying away from it 🙂 You can get the Os's faster from their respected sites or you can go to regular distro and use an ftp. You would get them downloaded by the time BT even starts to download