Not if the sample is mixed with HGH, Mcnamee was an ex-cop. To what purpose does someone even consider keeping around bio-hazard material?
If Clemens had nothing to hide, he would see or actively give consent to a third party test, for HGH. He isn't doing that though, is he?
He's taking the Floyd Landis route, deny everything, up until overwhelming proof is in his face, then he will say that the methodology is messed up.
I'm not certain anymore falconguard but when I was doing research in this field, (you can find my name referenced in numerous steroid books such as "stopping the clock, death in the locker room and a host of others), injected HGH couldn't be determined with confidence by a laboratory even while someone was on it, now I believe they have a two day window whence they can determine an injectable...two days, even if that's improved, I surely doubt it can be determined months after your cycle
I don't think that's changed, once matabolized the synthetic version of HGH looks exactly the same as when you produce it naturally\
in addition, a person can induce natural production of HGH very easily, through diet and excessive you can get a much higher concentration in your blood then normal
and it's really not going to be an indicator that you took HGH if you aren't currently on it anyway, I don't think there's any remnants once you go off your cycle, I could be wrong but that's where the technology was in this pathology when I was doing some of the research
as far as "to what purpose does someone consider keeping around bio hazardous material"?
well, that question sort of indicates my position, nobody does...unless he knew he was going to blackmail clemens in the future?
see my point?
also, it's only a hazard if Clemens has a communicable disease, transferred through blood (aids)
it's not a hazard at all
and we are talking about a drug dealer here, I don't give this evidence any credibility until someone shows me it can't be forged
don't get the wrong idea, if you read my previous post, I am no clemens fan and I am pretty certain Clemens is a roid head
but evidence is real or manufactured and this looks manufactured to me, I can't for the life of me figure out why this guy would "save it" unless he was planning on blackmailing the ball player which makes his testimony unbelieveable no matter what he says
this particular "evidence" is worthless as far as I can see, much more decisive would be team mates under oath