that was my point_kC_ said:there wouldnt be...
a standard non overclocked fx-55 it would need a 5.2ghz intel hunk of crappola which ofcourse doesnt exist
perris said:so an intell chip to match that would be >>>???...
j79zlr said:Who cares, the AMD FX-55 is $850. I would rather run dual xeon 3.0 GHz chips, and it would be cheaper.
my friend has a dell p4 dually laptopj79zlr said:I would rather run dual xeon 3.0 GHz chips, and it would be cheaper.
perris said:my friend has a dell p4 dually laptop
it is the fastest laptop I have ever seen, and faster then any desktop that wasn't also a dually.
but that's comparing apples to pinadas
this is why I want a 64 dually laptop however...that dually is lighning fast...I don't know who said dual chips don't give much gain for most users, but they were dead wring
probably, but for 15 minutes it can get so much done :laugh:j79zlr said:Dual p4 laptop? What is its battery life, about 15 minutes?
it clocks down on battery power...he says he gets two hours...I'll try to get the model number for you.j79zlr said:Dual p4 laptop? What is its battery life, about 15 minutes?