|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Canadian_divx
Joined: June 2002
Location: waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Planet Earth
Posts: 1,551
Reputation: 150
Power: 134 |
Mainly sitting with the OS decision. Right now its XP pro. was simple to set up and quick. I can continue with XP. I have a server 2003 license. a 120 day trial of home server and a 120 day trial of server 2008 all networking is gigabit. 9 systems pulling music and media from it. all hardwired. wanting to stick with windows so my 2 roomies can do some admin when im not around. not teaching them linux just yet. opinions welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
2003 and 2008 are both very fast at serving files - especially if you setup dynamic disks in stripped formation. It will comfortably max out gige when doing RAID0 to RAID0 transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,838
Reputation: 2369
Power: 170 |
Yep, I agree, 2k3 or 2k8 are the best choices ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Canadian_divx
Joined: June 2002
Location: waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Planet Earth
Posts: 1,551
Reputation: 150
Power: 134 |
any advantage from 2003 to 2008 for just simple file sharing? its all just between desktops and laptops. plus 4 modded xboxes for media centers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
OSNN.net Adventurer
Joined: November 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,567
Reputation: 330
Power: 131 |
Use windows home server and I really like it. Its is the easiest for straming media and there all sorts of readily availbe software to do it, plus it has great back up features. The added advantage it is at the end of the day server 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
home server is a crippled server 2003, since he already has a full on server 2003 license, thats the better option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
I never said I was nice
Joined: April 2003
Location: In The Void
Posts: 6,346
Blog Entries: 8
Reputation: 1877
Power: 0 |
slackware - gentoo - freebsd - are my big three choices, but if you have paid out for a 2003 server licence, which isn't cheap you might as well use it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
OSNN.net Adventurer
Joined: November 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,567
Reputation: 330
Power: 131 |
Don't agree
Originally Posted by LordOfLA
But that makes a lot of sense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
I never said I was nice
Joined: April 2003
Location: In The Void
Posts: 6,346
Blog Entries: 8
Reputation: 1877
Power: 0 |
home server is windows small business 2003, and if you look at http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsServ...s/default.mspx - i would have to say it dont have the greatest amount of features
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
OSNN.net Adventurer
Joined: November 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,567
Reputation: 330
Power: 131 |
Originally Posted by 3Dfiend
Your right there that was updated with power pack 1 ![]() It does 'just work' though and there is a ever growing community |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,490
Reputation: 2808
Power: 217 |
I personally suggest OpenSolaris. ZFS is absolutely fantastic and if you want to have a system that will keep running it is absolutely an awesome OS. I have it currently set up with 5 1 TB drives, in a raidz, means I lose 1 TB to parity information (much like RAID 5, but without the downsides of the write hole).
Currently have it sharing media out over the network and regularly I max out the gigbit connection in the machine without any issues what so ever. Only downside is the learning curve coming from Windows. It is a completely new OS to you, it may not be your best bet to go run it on a file server. Windows server 2008 is really cool, and I actually really enjoyed playing with it. Personally I will never use a Windows/Linux based product as a home file server. I prefer FreeBSD and OpenSolaris leaning more to towards the latter at the moment because of the ZFS file system, once that is fully ported to FreeBSD it will be a toss-up between the two. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help designing home file server | omega113 | Linux & BSD | 6 | July 7th, 2008 10:17pm |
| Network Shares Problem - Windows Home Server/Server 2003 | indyjones | Windows Server Systems | 5 | December 3rd, 2007 12:30am |
| Home server | canadian_divx | Windows Server Systems | 1 | May 3rd, 2007 4:54am |
| Linux as a File Server for Home Network | Heeter | Linux & BSD | 5 | July 26th, 2003 8:33pm |
| XP Home & NT 4.0 Server | adresen | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | May 30th, 2002 12:55am |