|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
Would like to know what you guys do about software that doesn't install nicely through a server. I got some software (Quickbooks, Simply Accounting, etc) that didn't come with .msi files, and they aren't working properly for the users in the domain, unless they have full admin privileges. Any thoughts? Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 297 |
Store it on the server and go around desktop to desktop and install it from the share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
Thanks Matt,
That's what I ended up doing with a couple of them. Now that you mention that, I think that I am just going to keep all the cd images on the server. Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 305 |
^That's what I do, works well. Master CDs are all kept offsite for DR reasons
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
But it is frustrating in that these pieces of software are not working well in a domain setup. they are intended to work in a stand alone machine. When the user logs on, the software only works partially. Some won't take updates from the software manufacturer site, even though I assigned the user as a power user on the workstation.
Oh well, I think that I need to vent, thanks for listening to me out. Maybe I have to rethink how I am setting up the workstations............... ![]() Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,031
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 213 |
Power users don't get anywhere near the permissions needed for software updates to work
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
If I set them up as administrator at the workstation, not in the Server, won't the user be able to install software on the workstation at that point? This is what we are trying to avoid, because of previous history.
Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,031
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 213 |
Yes. But nobody has ever yet justified not giving admin rights to workstation users given that 99% of windows and windows software assumes that all users have admin rights. This in turn creates unnecessary work and preventable issues when you remove those rights from users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 305 |
Heeter - what I typically do is give people admin rights for the first two weeks after a new PC or New Workstation setup. I don't really let them know, I more simply make sure the station is setup for thier job needs. If I know for sure it is beforehand, or after the two weeks I drop them down to normal users.
It's a happy medium you have to find, best of luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
lvl 17 Hax
Joined: January 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,829
Reputation: 1210
Power: 133 |
I use AutoPatcher and make my own modules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 297 |
I would never, ever use AutoPatcher in a network environment, e.g. a business network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154 |
Originally Posted by kcnychief
Thanks, D. I think that will be going this route. I will upgrade their status to admin on the workstations. then will drop them back to power user afterwards. I am doing some research on the various software that I am dealing with. I have found that one of these pieces of software can work in a terminal server environment with a whole swack of configging needed. I think that I might present the boss of this company this idea and see if he let's me test drive this. I think that this boss is getting frustrated at how slow the transition is from a 10 year old workgroup setup with each machine being so buggered up from spyware and viruses to this new domain setup. Anything of the top your guys heads that I should watch for? Thanks a million for all you guy's inputs, really much appreciated. Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 305 |
Each environment is unique, not much you can really do to plan ahead of the unknown. If you manage multiple environments, I recommend using the same "flavor" of Windows Server, and design your IP schemas, OUs and everything else the same. Makes everything much easier
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 297 |
Originally Posted by kcnychief
I agree to a certain extent. The first portion depends on what the job calls for. Some small businesses can't afford two servers which makes Small Business perfect, especially for those who want Exchange.
However, I agree with the second half of that statement. =] |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NET issues | cpomd | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | May 30th, 2006 7:10pm |
| Eek, CPU fan issues it seems | Son Goku | General Hardware | 5 | July 19th, 2005 10:38pm |
| RAM issues | the_music_man | General Hardware | 20 | September 27th, 2004 3:15am |
| RPM Issues!! | teenagepcpunk | Linux & BSD | 4 | July 26th, 2004 11:44pm |
| GF3 3D issues | Kasanagi | Graphics Cards | 2 | February 15th, 2002 1:14am |