|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
http://channels.lockergnome.com/it/a...th_share.phtml EDIT: this too.. http://www.windowsitlibrary.com/Content/592/1.html#1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
So seems the best thing to do is grant full access on the share and use active directory to set ntfs permissions as you get finer control over who does what and when
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
Originally Posted by LordOfLA
Yes and No, you would be better off using the Shared Folders snap-in, pending if you are logged on locally or interactively
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| users, access, and NTFS permissions | mfarley | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | August 8th, 2005 8:42pm |
| NTFS Permissions | pdania | Windows Desktop Systems | 3 | May 9th, 2004 1:57pm |
| NTFS permissions save and loading. | lirank | Windows Desktop Systems | 0 | March 15th, 2004 12:32pm |
| Win2k Share Permissions by Computer? | JustinCredible | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | April 3rd, 2003 9:57am |
| share folder with permissions... | GeeZuZz | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | December 17th, 2001 12:04pm |