|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 150 |
Your thoughts on this setup.... This is for a Win7 gaming machine. 4 gig 1066mghz DDR2 ram -or- 8 gig 800mghz DDR2 ram Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: October 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,242
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 951
Power: 86 |
for gaming? mm.. well, games don't use all that much ram, so you'll prolly have better results with the faster 4gb option
however, the system will be snappier with 8gb, and you'll definitely see a difference if you multitask with memory hungry programs |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 5,255
Reputation: 3386
Power: 196 |
Video games use massive amounts of RAM to hold textures. The info is cached on your "slow" system RAM and pulled into and out of your "fast" video card RAM as needed. 2 GB is not a whole lot of memory for gaming if you are using hi resolution (1280 or 1600) video settings.
There will be 2 sources of lag -pulling the textures out of system ram to video ram and pulling textures off the HDD to system RAM. The HDD to system is the real killer. I'd probably go with the 4GB on the MB. But in an ideal $$$ world I'd want speed and 4GB. I assumed you are using 64 BIT windows. You only get 3.2 GB available if you are using 32 BIT windows and the trade off is not as clear cut, though I'd still favor more RAM on the MB. Also, part of the speed difference is lost because 1066 ram will have more wait states. Not a massive loss but I thought I'd mention it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 150 |
Thanks for that great input, Leejend.
I have upgraded this HDD to a 150gig velociraptor, from a mundane 5400rpm 1.5terabyte HDD last week. I do have the generic 8 gigs of no-name DDR2 800 RAM in here, but, thanks to this post, will be moving to 4gigs of 1066 stuff later this weekend. I have upgraded to a Phenom II X4 965 BE yesterday from the Phenom X4 9850 BE that was in here. I also want to take advantage of my crossfire chipset on this board, so I will be removing the 9800GT that is in here now. All in all, it is not so bad right now. I am playing Crysis Warhead on the existing setup at 1680x1050, 2x antialiasing on this ASUS VW246H HDMI monitor. So far, the only real lag I have seen is when I spin around really fast. Initial game load times is slow too, But I attribute that to the fact that my Windows7 Libraries folders are pointed to a secondary drive, and it might also have to load something off Steam before it fires up (I bought the Crysis valuepack from Steam). Heeter |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
The Analog Kid
Joined: March 2002
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 4,638
Reputation: 1111
Power: 178 |
Why don't you take the best of both worlds... See if your 8 gigs of 800 will overclock. I have generic Wintec 800 that will do 1000 speeds easy (Micron D9 chips).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,880
Reputation: 4110
Power: 309 |
Originally Posted by Heeter
Other system specs? Size of display?
Typically, the 4GB would be the best bet for you. I have run into few situations where I have exceeded 4 GB myself and in hindsight I would have likely stayed with 4 or 6 GB. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| setup | McGuyver | Windows Desktop Systems | 7 | October 11th, 2002 12:53am |
| IE6 SetUP | renakuajo | Windows Desktop Systems | 1 | September 10th, 2002 12:45am |
| CPU Setup | andre9540 | General Hardware | 3 | June 14th, 2002 3:51am |
| HDD setup | stuy_b | General Hardware | 5 | May 11th, 2002 10:34pm |
| My Setup... | ac6210sr | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | January 18th, 2002 10:42pm |