|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: April 2005
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 634
Reputation: 260
Power: 92 |
About time..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 294 |
You must uninstall previous releases (Beta 2 or Release Canidate) prior to installing the RTM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
downloading now.
Maybe it'll fix the vga support for ubuntu
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
format c:
Joined: December 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,358
Reputation: 50
Power: 125 |
sorry to be such a noob, but besides compatibility, is there any reason to play with Virtual PC? I got a copy from my school, but I have no idea where to use it, or why to use it. Any good informative website suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 294 |
I use Virtual PC as a virtual lab to test software (without installing it on my production box), stay current with XP (now that I am using Vista full time), and to try out new server software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: October 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,242
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 951
Power: 86 |
anyone knows why is vista home premium not supported?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 294 |
Because VPC is considered a business product. VPC was never supported for XP Home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,015
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 209 |
beause the license doesn't allow virtualisation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
Bow Down to the King
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 13,312
Reputation: 4090
Power: 294 |
That's an even better reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
XPista7eopard*ix
Joined: April 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,014
Reputation: 2947
Power: 164 |
Because virtualization in general is not allowed in the Home/Home Premium license. Technically, i think the EULA license refers to running Home or Home Premium as a guest in a virtual machine.. not 100% sure why they would also not allow Home/Home Premium to RUN virtualization software..
I think in their "infinite" wisdom, they probably believe that a "home" user would have no need to run a virtual machine. And if you have a need for a "virtual" machine, you are really running a business and should therefor get a "business" edition of the OS. What it all really comes down to is microsoft trying to get as much money as they can.. gotta love M$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 302 |
Excellent, glad the RTM is here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 294 |
I've read that it still installs and works fine, but that it just isn't officially supported. It might be misinformation, but you might want to try installing it and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
XPista7eopard*ix
Joined: April 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 4,014
Reputation: 2947
Power: 164 |
it will run fine.. it just won't be supported.
Same thing in that you can install vista home into virtual hardware fine.. it just won't be supported (and you are then violating the license agreement). I don't think there is the same license stipulation in running VirtualPC on Vista Home however.. only if you want to run Vista Home within a virtualPC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,506
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 346 |
hardwre virtualisation is just an intel thing?
Box is greyed out on my FX. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 294 |
Originally Posted by Electronic Punk
Newer Socket AM2, F and S1 AMD procs also support hardware virtualization (AMD-V "Pacifica").
Your FX is a S939, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,506
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 346 |
Yeah, FX-57 is quite old and Vista keeps telling me I need to upgrade it.
Trying to hang on for Quadfather ![]() I am still a single core user
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 294 |
Well, my dual-core Opteron doesn't include it either. The Core Duo in my Tablet seems to though, although I haven't tried running VPC on that yet.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Exchange 2007/Outlook 2007 SSL Certificate Issue | serrano | Windows Server Systems | 0 | March 6th, 2008 3:50pm |
| IE7 Virtual PC Image and IE6 Virtual PC Image Refresh | madmatt | Submitted News | 0 | April 20th, 2007 1:37pm |
| Exchange 2007/Outlook 2007 SSL Certificate Question | madmatt | Windows Server Systems | 9 | February 15th, 2007 2:49am |
| Virtual PC 2007 Beta | madmatt | Windows Desktop Systems | 14 | January 5th, 2007 12:21am |