|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: May 2002
Location: Stoney Creek, ON, Canada
Posts: 828
Reputation: 500
Power: 109 |
Guys...
I need convincing. As a regular XP user, can someone perhaps lay out the sales pitch groundwork to convince me to buy Windows Vista. Amazon.ca has all of the versions priced. I see Home Premium for 299.99. I suppose that is reasonable. My system is a couple years old: 3.2 ghz P4, 1 gb ram, ati 1600Pro 512 mb AGP. I havent loaded any betas.. perhaps I should start with the public issue. But in terms of shelling out the 3 and a half bills, where does Vista go where XP does not? Interface improvements I can already see, but functionality wise? Also, what version is best for a more than average home user. I am guessing Premium. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,974
Reputation: 4941
Power: 279 |
Something worth honorable mention which should definitely be discussed, Paul T has a great article describing how you can achieve a lot of Vista benefits with XP and now
http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...ta_xp_apps.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
I'm Beginning Somehow...
Joined: June 2002
Location: XP-erience, NTFS, OSNN, here.....
Posts: 1,261
Reputation: 360
Power: 110 |
^ Excellent read..
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: May 2002
Location: Stoney Creek, ON, Canada
Posts: 828
Reputation: 500
Power: 109 |
Posted October 3rd.
talk about timing thanks for the link! |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 6,818
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 3651
Power: 179 |
If you can afford to upgrade and your hardware is capable, I see no reason to stay with XP. There's no reason to fall over yourself to upgrade, but sticking to XP is not recommended for the long term.
I'd say that waiting a few months while the early adopters work through all the driver and software issues, etc is a prudent plan for most people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
OSNN BASSMASTER
Joined: February 2005
Location: Land O Lakes, FL Posts: more than you know!
Posts: 2,277
Reputation: 1410
Power: 98 |
Originally Posted by LordOfLA
If you dont already have a dual-core or quad-core processor, or you wont be using your OS to do VERY CPU intensive applications there is little to NO reason to upgrade right away...
Especially if you follow the Microsoft mantra that they will extend the support for XP much the same as they did for windows 3.1, 98, 98 SE, NT, 2000 and I fell like they will do so yet again for XP... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Carbon based lifeform
Joined: February 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,466
Reputation: 2138
Power: 130 |
*twists jimi's arm behind his back*
Buy it! Because it is good for you, it is new, and you know you like new. *twists arm harder* Gimme me the money, I'll buy it for ya. Need more convincing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: June 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,797
Reputation: 2421
Power: 121 |
I have tried every version of Vista and am not that impressed with any of them so don't ask me to convince ya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,692
Reputation: 2960
Power: 234 |
You don't *need* Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
OSNN Proxy
Joined: January 2004
Location: Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent, England.
Posts: 3,479
Reputation: 1020
Power: 119 |
If you want to make a donation for yet more rubbish then give it to me.
I will trade you for your cash money windows 95. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
I'm Beginning Somehow...
Joined: June 2002
Location: XP-erience, NTFS, OSNN, here.....
Posts: 1,261
Reputation: 360
Power: 110 |
^Ouch....... That will hurt!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
Michaelsoft Systems CEO
Joined: February 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario Canada Earth
Posts: 3,100
Blog Entries: 8
Reputation: 2000
Power: 138 |
I'm going to hold on to XP as long as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: December 2002
Posts: 410
Reputation: 250
Power: 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 6,818
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 3651
Power: 179 |
silly anti-progress people
![]() Do what you will, but I guess your next upgrades will be from pentium 4's and athlon 64's to pentium 75s and DOS 6..... Otherwise the lot of you are hypocrits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,974
Reputation: 4941
Power: 279 |
I was thinking of ugprading to a Commadore 64 next actually.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
OSNN BASSMASTER
Joined: February 2005
Location: Land O Lakes, FL Posts: more than you know!
Posts: 2,277
Reputation: 1410
Power: 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,692
Reputation: 2960
Power: 234 |
Right now for me there aren't any absolute must have features in Vista. No need to upgrade just for the sake of upgrading. I'm past that phase.
IE7 is going to be available for XP. I don't use WMP. I don't need the security blanket as I'm a "fairly advanced" user that can tell if opening a link is going to mess up my system, or if a file is going to be a virus. Most "beginner" people will probably need Vista though, just for security reasons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Glaanies script monkey
Joined: February 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,758
Reputation: 1520
Power: 129 |
Originally Posted by Grandmaster
And there are not going to be.
The only true innovation will be if they can get IE to run in protected mode effectively. Time will tell, but concerning MSFT's history, I will venture to guess it wont really work correctly and/or will be compromised via virus/malware within days of Vistas release. If you've actually used Vista, you'll see little to no reason to upgrade. A little bit shinier, but still the same system. Configuration is a pain in the ass, everything is moved, hell I can't even set a static IP in my LAN on Vista. UAC is about the worst thing in the world. If you feel like paying $200-$400 for updated solitaire graphics, then Vista is worth the upgrade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #19 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,394
Reputation: 2617
Power: 190 |
There is a complete rewrite of minesweeper, solitaire and freecell included. That should say something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #20 |
|
There is no answer!
Joined: October 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 3,088
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1430
Power: 111 |
Jimi don't do it you fool, run run.....
![]() but seriously as X says they have some new games, i think the one where you make cakes will be the iceing on the cake for most
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VISTA THEME: Vista Blue Refresh Theme for Vista Basic Users | Vishal Gupta | Desktop Customisation | 8 | April 12th, 2008 5:48pm |
| [Vista Themes] Vista Blue and Vista Black for Windows Vista | Vishal Gupta | Desktop Customisation | 0 | March 8th, 2008 7:10pm |
| Help on buying new PC. | vern | General Hardware | 9 | June 10th, 2003 11:14pm |
| Buying a new car | zoey | Funny Farm | 4 | November 14th, 2002 3:49pm |
| How do I convince............. | OTE | Green Room | 4 | July 11th, 2002 1:06am |
![]() |