|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN One Post Wonder
Joined: January 2006
Posts: 1
Reputation: 0
Power: 0 |
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
█▄█ ▀█▄ █
Joined: April 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,949
Reputation: 4941
Power: 305 |
Originally Posted by Adso
First off, I bow to you with your RAM amounts
![]() Windows XP Professional x64 Edition supports up to 128 GB of physical RAM and 16 TB of virtual memory. Now, since you have 8GB, I would assume the 1.5-2x multipler still comes to effect, so roughly 12-16GB of Virtual RAM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
No lover of dogma
Joined: June 2004
Location: 439 East District, Mount Paozu
Posts: 1,980
Reputation: 700
Power: 123 |
What, is this an Oracle server or something?
I think it will be a long time before people start putting 8 GB into their home machines, at least even somewhat uncommonly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Got New Memory - Disable Virtual Memory? | BaroqueJim | General Hardware | 5 | June 16th, 2004 9:59am |
| Virtual memory is too low? | AaronMcarthur | Windows Desktop Systems | 13 | December 29th, 2002 12:13am |
| Virtual memory? | Aileron | Windows Desktop Systems | 13 | September 29th, 2002 3:45pm |
| virtual memory again | blinkers | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | April 18th, 2002 7:40pm |
| Virtual memory | hverduyckt | Windows Desktop Systems | 1 | March 21st, 2002 8:15pm |