|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185 |
http://ftp.raxco.com/pub/download/pd70/pd70ds.exe http://www.raxco.com - main website |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185 |
can we get this posted on the site news?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Feeeesh
Joined: August 2004
Location: Khobar, Saudi Arabia (for summer vacay)
Posts: 1,685
Reputation: 530
Power: 117 |
didn't it come out 2 weeks ago?
it was posted on the software section of osnn 2 weeks ago |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185 |
damn, then i must be behind, sorry about that then, anyways post your results in here i guess
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
Yeah, I posted and purchased it when it was released
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
High On Life!
Joined: January 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,590
Reputation: 1300
Power: 185 |
great piece of software huh ep?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,031
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 213 |
yup its great
![]() I'll be getting the my upgrade from 6 to 7 soon ![]() 7 just looks upgly :P |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: September 2002
Posts: 800
Reputation: 160
Power: 128 |
Won't work for me: http://forum.osnn.net/showthread.php...881#post430881 - i've been in contact with tech support and still won't work. I'm trying O&O and it seems just as good with it's own brand of "smart placement" - but with 5 different placement options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
Yeah, its pretty nice.
7 is alot flashier looking than 6, which is kinda interesting, not sure if I like the shaded blocks, but truth be told it isn't there to look pretty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: January 2004
Location: The far side of nowhere
Posts: 573
Reputation: 585
Power: 112 |
Originally Posted by Electronic Punk
I've used PerfectDisk since version 5. It's always been good, IMO. They say there is a speed increase between version 6 and 7 but I can't say I've noticed it yet. As for the flashier UI... *snore* I'm a bit tired of decent apps being given flashy UIs.
I just want a solid app that works! rotjong |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
Exactly, I like the tarting up of the interface, but the progress map should have been left.
Not noticed a difference in speed, but I have lots of big files on my hdd to defrag now (cheers half-life 2 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
I been using this for the past couple of weeks. I like it alot. It beats diskeeper hands down ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
OSNN Godlike Veteran
Joined: January 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 12,258
Reputation: 4333
Power: 291 |
Originally Posted by Electronic Punk
mine has a progress map, and a progress bar.
I ESPECIALLY like the option on every scan to do a simple defrag versus smart placement smart placement SHOULD NOT be done indescriminantly...do it once in a while, especially those of you that like to defrag all the time. btw...if you analyse first, it will tell you which is the best choice. I think I'll suggest an interface option to let the program automate which defrag should be done AN EXCELLANT PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
OSNN Godlike Veteran
Joined: January 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 12,258
Reputation: 4333
Power: 291 |
I'm more and more impressed with this program.
once an optimization is done, the speed of future scans is remarkable but my biggest joy is the evaluation...this is an honest evaluation, and it gives good advice on whether a defrag is a good choice, and which defrag is the most productive honestly, you shouldn't do defrags as a daily task, as you won't notice any performance gain doing it frequently, and you will be putting wear on your disk that isn't healthy good program and high marks from me...I have sent a few refinements I'd like to see of to raxco if you're using another companies defrag, give this one a go I want to suggest to everyone that after the first pagefile optimization, exclude that file from future defrags properly sized pagefile won't get fragmented once it's contiguous...but this program will move the pagefile to better areas on the disc, depending on how much info is written on the disk I don't like moving the pagefile for such small gains...all of the files have to be moved out and moved around and I don't like all that work on the drive unless it's going to give an enormous gain so optimize the pagefile once, then exclude it until your drive has changed character drastically also, if you've deleted a bunch of files, I wouldn't let the program optimized the pagefile either, since the drive will likely fill again anyway |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Raxco PerfectDisk 9 | zeke_mo | Windows Desktop Systems | 10 | January 23rd, 2008 5:47pm |
| PerfectDisk 25% Offer & Free Upgrade to PerfectDisk 9 | American Zombie | Windows Desktop Systems | 28 | December 20th, 2007 6:56pm |
| A little help with PerfectDisk please? | Viernafein | Windows Desktop Systems | 0 | October 23rd, 2006 6:20pm |
| Raxco PerfectDisk2000 v8.0 | rotjong | Windows Desktop Systems | 9 | September 7th, 2006 10:26pm |