|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: S.E. Florida
Posts: 119
Reputation: 20
Power: 127 |
My question is what is the opinion concerning the constantly released updated nVidia drivers and whether or not should one update to each release? Thx ahead. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: February 2003
Posts: 932
Reputation: 300
Power: 126 |
The drivers at the link below are not too bad, saves me a bit of time since they are 'pre-tweaked' and are updated only with major NVIDIA releases, thus (assuming official releases are good) keep speed, quality and stability to the maximum.
If your a 'speed tweaking freak' or just want to experiment with new features that beta drivers may or may not have, then by all means download the new drivers that seem to never stop pouring in, but if you do want speed, quality and stability then just use official releases. Omegadrive's Official Homepage |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,888
Reputation: 4110
Power: 313 |
![]() omega has been issued a cease and desist order from nvidia's lawyers to stop putting out OMEGA's of their drivers.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
OSNN Designer
Joined: July 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 8,722
Blog Entries: 106
Reputation: 1386
Power: 221 |
Its not that much of a trouble, yea they come out alot of the time. What i do is download the latest one, then do i what i usually do. Then after awhile, i think to myself "hey i havent got my video drivers for a while" so then i go and get the newest ones out there! Doing this is much easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: January 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 132
Reputation: 0
Power: 115 |
Wow. Nvidia is nuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: February 2003
Posts: 932
Reputation: 300
Power: 126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,888
Reputation: 4110
Power: 313 |
go to the DH forums.. there were rumours and Zardon himself posted saying he is unlikely to be making omegas of dets anymore due to behind the scenes reasons
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
NTFS abuser
Joined: November 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 380
Reputation: 30
Power: 120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
.:: FTPAlex ::.
Joined: June 2002
Location: Cheshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,156
Reputation: 10
Power: 133 |
whats up with 44.03?
Im using the 44.03 drivers and i personally think that every time there is an upgrade.. most of the time, there is a boost in performance from the card but maybe thats because im using Geforce 2 MX 400 ::confused: Alex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
NTFS abuser
Joined: November 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 380
Reputation: 30
Power: 120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
.:: FTPAlex ::.
Joined: June 2002
Location: Cheshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,156
Reputation: 10
Power: 133 |
yea but surely if they're trying to improve GF4 cards, there will be some help in the drivers relating to the GF2's considering same drivers are being used... but i dunno, ive just noticed improvements which keeps me happy for a while longer
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
Ahhh gone are the days of optimized 3dfx drivers which really added features and performance. With Nvidia, best bet is too stick with the originals. Not many mods out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: January 2003
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 5,261
Reputation: 3386
Power: 199 |
The last, best I saw was the 41.09. 40.72 was a good driver too.
Everything since has been an attempty to squeeze a few more points out of the benchmarks. Real game performance has not improved for a long time. The 40.72 and 41.09 seemed to improve texture quality some on my GE3 card. I think the 4 designation means they are optimised for the GE4 series. SAZAR? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
Argentinean Dogo
Joined: March 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: 20
Power: 101 |
Hey Alex is Axel, im using an old Gforce 2 too, and i ve just heard that its better to use an old driver better than a new one for this "old" card, could this be true?
Its logical to think that if its new it ll bring improvements, but in the other hand ,its logical to think that those new drivers would be made with the new cards in mind. I always have the last drivers, but now im thinking i will try putting an old one to check. So, i dont know... Any one do? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
.:: FTPAlex ::.
Joined: June 2002
Location: Cheshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,156
Reputation: 10
Power: 133 |
personally, ive found that over time, my Geforce 2 has performed better as the new drivers are being released but that my be my opinion. I like the new drivers and i hope to see them keep on comming
hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
.:: FTPAlex ::.
Joined: June 2002
Location: Cheshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,156
Reputation: 10
Power: 133 |
However, trying out some older drivers could be interesting to see.. but if you've noticed on the new drivers, it still states that the Geforce 2 Series are still supported with them :confused:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
F@H - Is it in you?
Joined: April 2002
Location: Between Austin and Tampa
Posts: 14,888
Reputation: 4110
Power: 313 |
nah the det versions are unlikely to be based on version of the graphics core... may be possible lol.. but I dunno... I think its more to do with the feature set each brings... the 50.xx series is on the sidelines waiting to debut... dunno what this will bring to the table but I sure as hell hope it enables most of the features in the FX gpu's |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Tomorrow Tweaking Today
Joined: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,516
Reputation: 240
Power: 127 |
44.90 drivers are the fastest that I've benchmarked. Omega drivers not very stable on overclocked card and perform much slower than 44.71 and 44.90. Wish there was a substantial performance increase rather than petty insignificant tweaks - driver performance for geforce 4 and below pretty much can't be improved any further - statistically impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #19 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Isn't the 44.03 drivers aimed mostly for the FX card?
As it is only WHQL:ed for them.... :confused: Quote: "Delivers an incredible 30% increase in performance over previous Detonator 40 drivers** The industry’s best Microsoft® DirectX® 9 support Ultimate “The Way It’s Meant to be Played” experience ------- * 44.03 is WHQL Certified for the GeForce FX family of GPUs ** Performance results based upon GeForce FX 5600 Ultra running UnrealTournament 2003 Antalus flyby." - End Quote. But then... with the 50.xx drivers they might also let go of the GeForce 4 cards.... |
|
|
|
Top | #20 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| nVidia Drivers | ming | Windows Desktop Systems | 7 | January 17th, 2005 9:51pm |
| NVidia Drivers | soulghost | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | March 9th, 2004 2:20am |
| What drivers to use (nVidia) | lieb39 | Windows Desktop Systems | 11 | June 4th, 2003 10:06pm |
| NVidia Vanta Drivers & S3 drivers? | G-Lizard86 | Windows Desktop Systems | 6 | October 18th, 2002 11:26am |
| New 40.72 Nvidia drivers | BonyTony | Windows Desktop Systems | 1 | October 5th, 2002 2:10pm |