|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: March 2004
Location: pottstown pa usa northern hemisphere earth
Posts: 609
Reputation: 0
Power: 106 |
they will play fine together, they are both NT based..... doesnt matter which is loaded first although i always like loading oldest to newest with anything, never had any conflicts that way
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,496
Reputation: 2808
Power: 220 |
Should work just fine, had done the same thing before and was using XP primarily, but now i just use Windows 2k, i am sick of XP screwing up
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
well i aint sick of xp, i just need server running so i can try stuff as i go along as im doing an mcse. going to do it 2day so i will report back.
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
ok, i installed 2000 server on the other partition and was getting a choice on boot. but the pc wasnt booting into xp, only server. so i replaced ntdlr at root C: with my back up and now it works perfect. ty.
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
LinuXPert
Joined: December 2001
Location: Cornwall Nr. England
Posts: 453
Reputation: 0
Power: 132 |
I've always been under the impression that XP has to be installed last, becuase of the way it buggers up.....ooops I mean installs it's MBR.
Could be wrong, never tried it with 2000. I duel boot with Linux and 98 (98 for just ONE piece of software, wonder if any of you music nuts know what i'm talking about hehehe) |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: February 2004
Posts: 1,084
Reputation: 130
Power: 113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah i was under the same impression, but as win 2000 supports ntfs and pretty much everything else that xp does i thought it might work. all the manuals say that xp should be the last os you should install, backing up ntldr then replacing the new version after installing win 2000 did the trick.
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
LinuXPert
Joined: December 2001
Location: Cornwall Nr. England
Posts: 453
Reputation: 0
Power: 132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
*
Joined: December 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 6,496
Reputation: 2808
Power: 220 |
in most aspects but windows xp is more like this windows XP == (Windows 2000 + Windows 98 + Windows ME) But yeah, 3rd's is Windows 2000. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vista boot failure with dual boot system. | Old Pilot | Windows Desktop Systems | 0 | January 22nd, 2008 7:01pm |
| Setting up Linux server, apache,etc... dual boot | smsmasters | Linux & BSD | 2 | January 28th, 2005 3:44pm |
| SQL Server 2000 SP2/3 for MSDE 2000? | Shellhead | Windows Desktop Systems | 1 | February 2nd, 2003 6:22pm |
| windows 2000 server, with RRAS, how to protect the server? | jkoXP | Windows Desktop Systems | 5 | December 17th, 2002 3:37pm |
| XP pro and win 2000 dual boot? | jphenrick | Windows Desktop Systems | 5 | September 21st, 2002 5:42pm |