Reply
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #1
 
Heeter's Avatar
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154

Default IIS 6 in Server 2003

Hi guys,

I am giving Server 2003 beta a whirl. This is my first try at a server OS. My question is this: What is IIS6, basically. Is it the same as IE6? Is it better than IE6? Thanks in advance. I have noticed that Server is basically the same as XP. I find it faster than Xp.

Heeter
Heeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #2
JohnnyGreb
 
JohnnyGreb's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

IIS stands for (I think) Internet Information Server.
Basically it's a web server. Think: "by Microsoft", Think "exploitable"

Seriously, it's very powerful, as it can do ASP pages, etc. But requires quite a bit of tweaking (in my experience) to set up decently and secure.


-JG
  Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #3
 
Enyo's Avatar
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: February 2003
Posts: 1,338
Reputation: 330
Power: 130

Default

You will find it faster to start with, bearing in mind you have given the server so roles and have not background processes on your system!

IIS guide:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...is/Default.asp

Internet Information Server, much more than just a web server though. Its got HTTP, NNTP and FTP abilities. It is powerful. IIS 5 was a security nightmare but 6 is looking really good.

IE6 is the browser, a client tool. IIS is the server side of the web

JohnnyGreb, tweaking to get secure is not so much in 6 thankfully but i agree 5 was a nightmare!

Securing 5 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec...st/iis5chk.asp

(god bless IIS lockdown)

Tuning 5:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...e/iis5tune.asp
Enyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #4
JohnnyGreb
 
JohnnyGreb's Avatar
Unregistered
Posts: n/a

Default

Originally posted by Enyo tweaking to get secure is not so much in 6 thankfully
That's good to hear! I'm really not a MS hater.. it's just they have a bad track record when it comes to security...

-JG
  Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #5
 
Enyo's Avatar
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: February 2003
Posts: 1,338
Reputation: 330
Power: 130

Default

Originally posted by JohnnyGreb
That's good to hear! I'm really not a MS hater.. it's just they have a bad track record when it comes to security...

-JG
Can say that again Good work is being done to bring security standards up!
Enyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8th, 2003 Top | #6
 
Heeter's Avatar
Overclocked Like A Mother
Joined: July 2002
Location: In front of my computer
Posts: 2,729
Reputation: 684
Power: 154

Default

Thanks so much guys, for the info. I am reading up on it now.


Heeter
Heeter is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Network Shares Problem - Windows Home Server/Server 2003 indyjones Windows Server Systems 5 December 2nd, 2007 11:30pm
windows server 2003 standard or slackware linux as server Dark Atheist Benchmarks & Performance 27 July 19th, 2007 12:24am
Server 2003 Exchange 2003 connection prob for clients!! Troy Windows Server Systems 1 February 28th, 2006 12:18pm
Exchange Server 2003 / Exchange HTTP Virtual Server madmatt Windows Server Systems 14 August 2nd, 2005 11:25pm
NT4 server user base import to 2003 server? GeorgGG Windows Desktop Systems 8 December 18th, 2003 6:31am