|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
MS-DOS 2.0
Joined: February 2002
Location: Ásgarðr
Posts: 854
Reputation: 420
Power: 138 |
Melon |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
If you are the only user there really is no need for you to go dynamic. Making the drives dynamic enables you to "mount " drives....basically you can take partitions or other drives and make them part of another parrtition or drive. Let's say you have several people on a network and they are allowed a set amount of drive space or whatever space they have is just about full, you make part of another drive that has sufficient space part of the drive you need to enlarge.The drives retain their letters c: or d: for example, and work goes on.
Unless you are going to get another drive and do a software raid configuration staying basic is just fine. Grym ( and waiting for people to disagree) blayd |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynamic vs Basic Disk Structure | Sage | General Hardware | 2 | September 24th, 2009 4:41pm |
| 2 Questions about SATA & Basic v Dynamic Disc | mac1 | General Hardware | 4 | May 11th, 2005 7:09pm |
| Basic and Dynamic Disk | dreamworks | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | September 18th, 2003 2:40pm |
| Dynamic Disk or Basic Disk? | ElementalDragon | General Hardware | 5 | March 19th, 2003 2:31am |
| Dynamic Disk??? | bheagle | General Hardware | 10 | April 7th, 2002 2:46pm |