|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 379
Reputation: 10
Power: 131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,695
Reputation: 30
Power: 148 |
it's just a matter of personal choice really, they both do the same thing, I use Drive Image, but Ghost is just as good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Never used Drive Image but can recommend Ghost it has saved my bacon many times
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Both are fine products - the user interface in Drive Image 2002 is friendlier than Ghost's. Keep in mind these two products do not make backups in the traditional sense - they image the drive(s).
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
I use Drive Image 6 at home and at work I use Ghost don't ask me why lol. My supplier gave them to me when I purchased 10 computers at one time and I took Drive Image home and left Ghost at work and they both work flawlessly and have saved me many times. Just pick one or the other...no real difference.
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Norton Ghost has a new version out, Ghost 2003. Two notable new features, a windows interface so you do not necessarily have to use DOS (unless you can't boot into windows), and support for NTFS partitions. There are other things new as well.
|
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
Tech Junkie
Joined: April 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,256
Reputation: 4260
Power: 298 |
My personal preference is DriveImage 2002, but Norton should be good as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: December 2001
Posts: 379
Reputation: 10
Power: 131 |
Thanks for the info. I have used Ghost successfully, but find the interface confusing. For example, I use the same floppy disc to create the image on CD, and to restore the image, although I think I am supposed to use two different floppies. I also have opted for 'Make the CD bootable' but when I boot up to it, I find that it just doesn't boot. I have the boot to cd option in the bios selected. My slipstream CD of XP, for instance, boots great.
Also when I try to restore the image, it takes me several attempts, before I manage to select the correct option. It seems I have to select the 'A' drive where the floppy is, rather than the 'D' drive where my CD is. I have read all the instructions and I still seem to get it wrong. However I have to say that when I do get it right the image is restored perfectly. I use Ghost 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Don't know that many imagers, but I do know Ghost. And I love it. With Norton Ghost you can write images directly to Tape or CD. You can split images while writing them, or you can split them at a later time, with Ghost Explorer. Ghost Explorer even allows you to add or remove files from a .GHO image. There's a new version out... Enterprise Edition 7.5. It looks really hot! Check out some of its features: http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.c...fm?ProductID=3 Home version (Ghost 2003): http://www.symantec.com/sabu/ghost/ghost_personal/ Kind regards, Willem Moolenaar ps. No, I don''t work for Symantec.
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Slipstreaming vs. Ghost Image | Jesse | Windows Desktop Systems | 13 | July 27th, 2005 9:17pm |
| Ghost Image | Capricorn | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | September 18th, 2002 4:39pm |
| Ghost or Drive Image | dreamliner77 | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | July 5th, 2002 3:37am |
| Ghost or Drive Image? | robin.munro | Windows Desktop Systems | 4 | May 5th, 2002 10:53pm |
| Drive Image or Ghost | dreamliner77 | Windows Desktop Systems | 6 | March 27th, 2002 4:47am |