|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #1 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: June 2002
Location: OREGON
Posts: 719
Reputation: 60
Power: 128 |
Is there anyway to get rid of the build ID: it looks terrible there? |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #2 |
|
The Last High
Joined: December 2001
Location: London
Posts: 18,510
Blog Entries: 51
Reputation: 3652
Power: 349 |
Is this a mozilla issue or something specifically we this forum?
I am not a Mozilla user myself.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #3 |
|
So Very Tired
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 51
Reputation: 0
Power: 125 |
Yes, there is. I followed the instructions below and it worked fine for me. The instructions are really for a unix system, but it works for windows - just look for the 'chrome' folder inside where you installed Mozilla, and use notepad instead of vi to edit the file. You'll also need to be able to extract files from a .jar - the Java SDK from Sun will give you what you need.
Removing Build ID from Mozilla Title Bar I keep my Mozilla.app in /Applications/Internet Applications/Mozilla/ so you will need to consider where you keep your copy of Mozilla when following these instructions. Important: these instructions worked for me. I can't guarantee they will work for you. 1. Open Terminal. 2. Next type: cd "/Applications/Internet Applications/Mozilla/Mozilla.app/Contents/MacOS/chrome" (or whatever the path to your mozilla install is - probably "Program Files\mozilla.org\Mozilla\chrome") 3. Make a backup of the en-US.jar file: cp en-US.jar en-US.jar.backup 4. Now you must unpack the en-US.jar file by typing: jar -xf en-US.jar 5. Now type: cd locale\en-US\navigator 6. Now edit the navigator-title.dtd file using notepad: notepad navigator-title.dtd (if there is no navigator-title.dtd, look in navigator.dtd). 7. Remove both occurrences of {&buildId.label;} and save the file. 8. Now type: cd ..\..\.. 9. Repack the jar file: jar -cf en-US.jar locale/ 10. Quit Terminal and launch Mozilla. If everything is working correctly, you can go back in and delete the backup copy of en-US.jar. If something got screwed up, restore the backup. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #4 |
|
Good grief Charlie Brown
Joined: May 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 5,920
Reputation: 560
Power: 187 |
As mbunny would say, "Use IE".
/me duck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #5 |
|
Queen of Farts
Joined: March 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,949
Blog Entries: 7
Reputation: 1843
Power: 252 |
Moved to Applications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #6 |
|
OSNN Designer
Joined: July 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 8,722
Blog Entries: 106
Reputation: 1386
Power: 221 |
USE OPERA, its the best, !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #7 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Don't make me hit you Hipster =)
DO NOT follow Dipsomaniac's directions... Those are for the Linux version of Mozilla and cannot be used for the Win32 build. I tried a bugzilla search to no avail... i'll see around if there is a fix for this... but i don't think most people would consider this a bug =P I LOVE this quote i saw while i was searching in Bugzilla How to make COBOL a great language. Remove the OBOL |
|
|
|
Top | #8 |
|
So Very Tired
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 51
Reputation: 0
Power: 125 |
Wrong, bunny. I use the Windows version myself, and I've used the instructions to remove the build id - just like I said in the original post. It's just Java, for chrissake. In fact, Napalmnthemorni, if you're using Mozilla 1.0, I can attach the .jar file for you to drop in, since that's the only thing I've changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #9 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: June 2002
Location: OREGON
Posts: 719
Reputation: 60
Power: 128 |
That'll work Dipsomaniac. I can send you an email or post the link to the file.. Its not that big of a deal i guess. I do like using IE and Mozilla both. Sometimes I just get bored of looking at the same old IE looking theme,.. Its so "fricken" boring, but it if more efficient to get around. Some of you guys like mozilla better and claim it is faster, but I haven't seen the difference. I'm using poxyconn and running at about 97029 pbs currently.. But I'd say Mozilla is slightly faster. Can anyone tell me why Mozilla graphics load slower? Anyone else have this occur. Again not a major issue, but I'd say about a 10 to 15 second delay in graphics display. Is this the Proxyconn. Speaking of, any comments on Proxyconn?
later.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #10 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Mozilla tends to get the whole page and display. Mozilla waits for the entire pic to download then displays it rather than showing you a fuzzy version of it (if the image supports it) and gradually getting clearer... less system resources required to display it when finished rather than having the picture redrawn 4 times
|
|
|
|
Top | #11 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,574
Reputation: 2960
Power: 260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #12 |
|
So Very Tired
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 51
Reputation: 0
Power: 125 |
Apparently, I can't actually attach the file - it's too big. I'll see if I can find a place to put it up for download.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #13 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,574
Reputation: 2960
Power: 260 |
ok thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #14 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,574
Reputation: 2960
Power: 260 |
hehe thats good to hear
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #15 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: June 2002
Location: OREGON
Posts: 719
Reputation: 60
Power: 128 |
In Mozilla the pictures aren't fuzzy and then become clearer, they just appear slower after the page has opened up. In IE I just wait longer for entire page to open up with pictures up. It takes about the same time for both, but it appears Mozilla is faster because the page loads faster, then I wait for the picture!!!!!!!
Dipsomaniac I went into windows explorer and found my mozilla file and opened up C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\Mozilla\chrome and tried to open up en-US executible jar file, however I was unable to open? I looked for the notpad document but didn't see one. Where is the Build ID: # located? Is it in the en-US jar, if so I'd like to open it up and rip that Build ID# out!!! thanks tim |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #16 |
|
So Very Tired
Joined: March 2002
Posts: 51
Reputation: 0
Power: 125 |
You have to use the jar tool out of the Sun SDK to extract files out of the .jar archive (the syntax is in my first post in this thread).
But if you want, you can grab en-US.jar from http://www3.sympatico.ca/mdesg/en-US.jar. Just back up the one you've got and drop this one in, then restart Mozilla (including stopping the QuickLaunch app if you use it). If Mozilla doesn't work, restore the old file. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #17 |
|
OSNN Senior Addict
Joined: June 2002
Location: OREGON
Posts: 719
Reputation: 60
Power: 128 |
GREAT! thanks Dipsomaniac.... I'll give it a go and see what happens..
Oh yea, I have another similar question. With IE at the top of the browser I still have IE saying currently: "XP-experience Forums-Reply to Topic-Microsoft Internet Explorer provided by AT&T WorldNet Service.. " I don't use AT&T anymore,.. Any Ideas on how to get rid of this one.. :confused:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #18 |
|
Electronica Addict
Joined: February 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,574
Reputation: 2960
Power: 260 |
it worked! thanks
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is there a webpage that acts like a browser within a browser? | lancer | Windows Desktop Systems | 14 | June 16th, 2005 8:58am |
| Mozilla Browser Security Patch | tdinc | Windows Desktop Systems | 3 | July 9th, 2004 7:39am |
| Mozilla.org Discussion (Mozilla, FireBird, Thunderbird, etc) | SPeedY_B | Windows Desktop Systems | 352 | January 2nd, 2004 4:57pm |
| if i use mozilla browser will it slow down my PC? | vadislav | Windows Desktop Systems | 16 | December 29th, 2002 1:05am |
| if i have mozilla browser, will i be able to download freeware | vadislav | Windows Desktop Systems | 6 | December 4th, 2002 11:09pm |