|
Member Login:
|
|
 |
May 4th, 2002
|
Top | #1 |
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Ghost or Drive Image?
Norton Ghost 2002 Drive Image 2002 Ta |
|
|
May 4th, 2002
|
Top | #2 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
My opinion is, that they are both reliable. But, for use at home, Drive Image is the better choice. It's got enough functions for your basic (disaster) needs. And it's very easy to use. But you can't use it over a network.
So, for the more heavy duty stuff (installing an image on 500 pc's!), i would recommend Ghost. |
|
|
|
May 4th, 2002
|
Top | #3 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
I used Ghost 7.5 Corporate Edition.
The boot floppy is all thats needed to make and restore backups. |
|
|
|
May 5th, 2002
|
Top | #4 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Drive Image
I have bought nearly all the versions of Drive Image and really like them. Simple to run. I just bought the NEW "Drive Image 2002" which can now do disk to disk copying/cloning within Windows. Take a look at this new program!
|
|
|
|
May 5th, 2002
|
Top | #5 |
|
Unregistered
Posts: n/a
|
Hell, I tried using drive image 5.0 to do a disk to disk copy for new drive. When finished, program said that it had hidden old drive partitions and made new drive partitions active, but upon reboot no drives recognized, period. Went through hell and ended up doing a clean install of xp, losing all of my good stuff developed over months of use, etc.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Slipstreaming vs. Ghost Image | Jesse | Windows Desktop Systems | 13 | July 27th, 2005 9:17pm |
| Ghost or Drive Image? | Capricorn | Windows Desktop Systems | 9 | September 25th, 2002 9:55pm |
| Ghost Image | Capricorn | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | September 18th, 2002 4:39pm |
| Ghost or Drive Image | dreamliner77 | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | July 5th, 2002 3:37am |
| Drive Image or Ghost | dreamliner77 | Windows Desktop Systems | 6 | March 27th, 2002 4:47am |
