|
|
![]() |
|
|
Top | #21 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #22 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: June 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,864
Reputation: 2689
Power: 151 |
Originally Posted by Johnny
I did not know this so I will check it out.
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #23 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: October 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,242
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 951
Power: 90 |
just checkin back guys.. i gave utp a million chances, but its always slower! i dont know wth is going on, but for now i'm sticking to good ol' tcp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #24 |
|
OSNN Addict
Joined: January 2004
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 198
Reputation: 40
Power: 104 |
some private trackers are banning it...for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #25 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: October 2006
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,242
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 951
Power: 90 |
really? i dont use private trackers anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #26 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
I haven't used a private tracker in a while either ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #27 |
|
- geek -
Joined: September 2003
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 5,224
Reputation: 1730
Power: 175 |
The reason for it's banning (well part of it really) ... other then it throttling users, is that it favors uTP over TCP and will try and fill every slot with them first. That means that it's only looking for uTorrent 2.0 clients first, and possible only for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #28 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,031
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 213 |
UTP and utorrents uTP are two totally different things - please ensure you're talking about the right thing
![]() UTP is the "fire and forget" protocol where as TCP is concerned about there actually being a stable connection. It was a very poor decision imo to name a traffic throttleing technology after the UTP protocol. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #29 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
I am maybe they UTP in utorrent stands for uTorrent Protocol?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #30 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: June 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,864
Reputation: 2689
Power: 151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #31 |
|
- geek -
Joined: September 2003
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 5,224
Reputation: 1730
Power: 175 |
I had it correct.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #32 |
|
OSNN Veteran Addict
Joined: June 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,864
Reputation: 2689
Power: 151 |
Originally Posted by Xie
I don't think this is true. I have seen peers uploading/downloading from me with good speeds while using clients other than µTorrent or a pre 2.0 version of µTorrent. I tested a few torrents using 1.8 and 2.0 versions of µTorrent with no difference in speeds at all as the torrent completed in the same amount of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #33 |
|
- geek -
Joined: September 2003
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 5,224
Reputation: 1730
Power: 175 |
Originally Posted by American Zombie
It is true (not 100% of the time) but that is why it's banned at several private trackers right now and why it's been kinda fixed in 2.0.1 build.
If you have a smaller swarm though you'll probably connect to less non-uTorrent folks with 2.0 then you would before. It also really depends on how people configure the bt.transp_disposition settings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #34 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
I have noticed through out the years that I been using utorrent, that it is a little slower than some of the other ones. I am not sure why this is, but is something I got used to .. I would like to try and figure it out though.
Something else, When you have it sitting there in idle mode and nothing downloading or uploading. You look at the traffic info; you will see that it is still uploading and downloading. Any idea why it does that? I know it's not the auto update feature, as I turned it off and it still did the same thing. I found that to be something that causes a lag on my connection, which in turn will force me to close it out to get the speed back up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #35 |
|
- geek -
Joined: September 2003
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 5,224
Reputation: 1730
Power: 175 |
Originally Posted by Johnny
I think the most "aggressive" client right now is Deluge (fastest). As far as that tiny bit of traffic, it's just uT checking with the tracker and checking with peers most likely. It's nothing to worry about and the amount of traffic is very small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #36 |
|
Godlike!
Joined: February 2004
Location: Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 7,031
Blog Entries: 5
Reputation: 4137
Power: 213 |
It's occurred to me that I actually meant UDP in my previous post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top | #37 |
|
Paul Reed Smith
Joined: January 2004
Location: Happy Valley
Posts: 4,869
Reputation: 2369
Power: 173 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTF, this an odd bit torrent claim | Son Goku | Green Room | 5 | January 8th, 2006 12:28pm |
| µTorrent 1.3 released | lad_in_brum | Windows Desktop Systems | 2 | December 10th, 2005 11:07pm |
| Bit Torrent | Spudly | Windows Desktop Systems | 9 | June 16th, 2004 7:30am |
| Bit Torrent | mike09 | Windows Desktop Systems | 32 | January 30th, 2004 2:10am |
| torrent help | Andy | Windows Desktop Systems | 20 | December 18th, 2003 2:39am |