Western Digital HDD's, Aint this just a kick in the....

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Maveric169, Dec 15, 2004.

  1. Maveric169

    Maveric169 The Voices Talk to Me

    Messages:
    1,148
    Location:
    Elkhart, IN
    Well I guess you learn something new everyday. For about ohhh the last 3 months I have trying to figurare out why I could not get my primary HDD to go into UDMA mode 6. I just assumed that the WD 80GB drive just didn't have the technology supported when it was made as it was about 3 years old.

    Well after my recent HDD failure I bought a new WD 160GB HDD w/8MB Cache and figurared that this newer drive would definatly support UDMA mode 6. But yet again, no matter what I tried I could not get the drive into UDMA 6. So back to the manufacture, after crawling through their site for about an hour I came across a startling revelation!

    And so dies my quest to get my primary drive into UDMA mode 6!:cry:
     
    onimkron likes this.
  2. NetRyder

    NetRyder Tech Junkie Folding Team

    Messages:
    13,256
    Location:
    New York City
    You're not really missing much. It's only the initial burst transfer rate that's really affected. The difference in sustained transfer rates of large files isn't all that big. I've used drives at both ATA/100 and 133, and I've never noticed a significant difference.
     
    Steevo likes this.
  3. Steevo

    Steevo Spammer representing. Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    2,566
    True.dat

    Most HDD's can only sustain a 35-45Mbps data transfer in optimal conditions.
     
  4. Maveric169

    Maveric169 The Voices Talk to Me

    Messages:
    1,148
    Location:
    Elkhart, IN
    Well I know back when I had my Maxtor drive as of OS drive with UDMA 6 my comp booted and loaded to the desktop much quicker than it does now. I never noticed any other difference in performance, just agravating waiting 2 mins to load on startups. But such is life, still better than back in DOS days.
     
  5. Mainframeguy

    Mainframeguy Debiant by way of Ubuntu Folding Team

    Messages:
    3,763
    Location:
    London, UK
    were you booting from hibernation? That WOULD do it! Have to say that even with my new SATA drive the top rate I get from HDTach is around 100 MB/s sustained - so SATA still sticks at UDMA5.

    I think it is the next genberation we are after to see the big jump - and they are going to cost so I will not be going there for two or three years maybe when we see the cost/GB become reasonable
     
  6. NetRyder

    NetRyder Tech Junkie Folding Team

    Messages:
    13,256
    Location:
    New York City
    Cheap, high-capacity solid-state drives.
    Ah, that'll be the day. :D
     
  7. LordOfLA

    LordOfLA Godlike!

    Messages:
    7,027
    Location:
    Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK
    I have an ATA100 Segate 120GB 8mb cache and an ATA133 80GB MAxtor 8mb cache, the seagate is faster.

    No point in ata133 :p
     
  8. Xie

    Xie - geek - Subscribed User Folding Team

    Messages:
    5,275
    Location:
    NY, USA
    Aren't HD boxes labeled with either ATA100 or ATA133 these days?
     
  9. Steevo

    Steevo Spammer representing. Political User Folding Team

    Messages:
    2,566
    Dunno, I have never bought a boxed HD.


    :D
     
  10. ming

    ming OSNN Advanced

    Messages:
    4,252
    Location:
    UK
    didn't know UDMA 6 existed. lol. thought UDMA 5 was the latest.
     
  11. dave holbon

    dave holbon Moderator

    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    London England
    From ATA100 (mode 5) upwards there is no significant performance increase in actual usage that can be detected by any user running any application under XP or 200 or NT.

    ATA133 (mode 6) with an eight meg cache does not provide any significant increase in performance at all when looked at by the user, it’s of technical significance only. This also applies to SATA drives which in effect perform no quicker than ATA drives (yet). The technical differences are not measurable in “real” systems but will be soon.

    All IDE drives no matter what standard they conform to are “knackered” by their lack of intelligence in relation to “SCSI” drives which have an on-board CPU (of sorts) so can accept messages from the OS and act on them without generating any interrupts.

    Soon all hard drives of the mechanical variety will be obsolete anyway as solid sate devices become the mainstream. They are on the way.

    :) :)
     
  12. Admiral Michael

    Admiral Michael Michaelsoft Systems CEO Folding Team

    Cant wait
    :)
     
  13. Maveric169

    Maveric169 The Voices Talk to Me

    Messages:
    1,148
    Location:
    Elkhart, IN
    Do you by chance have any reading sources WRT solid state drives?